Microsoft Visual SourceSafe vs Plastic SCM

Microsoft Visual SourceSafe — Microsoft Visual SourceSafe is a version control system that allows software teams to manage source code changes. It provides versioning, check-in/check-out capabilities, and supports multi-user acces

Plastic SCM — Plastic SCM is a distributed version control system designed for teams of developers working on Windows, Linux and Mac. It focuses on performance, security, flexibility and ease of use.

Microsoft Visual SourceSafe offers Version control system for source code, Check-in/check-out capabilities, Version history and ability to roll back changes, Multi-user access with security controls, Integration with Visual Studio IDE, while Plastic SCM provides Distributed version control, High performance, Flexible branching models, Integrates with IDEs like Visual Studio, Supports Windows, Linux and Mac.

Feature	Microsoft Visual SourceSafe	Plastic SCM
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Development	Development

Product Overview

Microsoft Visual SourceSafe

Description: Microsoft Visual SourceSafe is a version control system that allows software teams to manage source code changes. It provides versioning, check-in/check-out capabilities, and supports multi-user access.

Plastic SCM

Description: Plastic SCM is a distributed version control system designed for teams of developers working on Windows, Linux and Mac. It focuses on performance, security, flexibility and ease of use.

Key Features Comparison

Microsoft Visual SourceSafe Features

• Version control system for source code
• Check-in/check-out capabilities
• Version history and ability to roll back changes
• Multi-user access with security controls
• Integration with Visual Studio IDE
• File locking to prevent conflicts
• Branching and merging support
• Centralized repository

Plastic SCM Features

• Distributed version control
• High performance
• Flexible branching models
• Integrates with IDEs like Visual Studio
• Supports Windows, Linux and Mac

Pros & Cons Analysis

Microsoft Visual SourceSafe

Pros

• Easy to learn and use
• Tight integration with Microsoft ecosystem
• Good performance for small to midsize teams
• Handles text files well
• Low cost compared to other commercial options

Cons

• Limited scalability for large projects/teams
• No distributed version control support
• Less robust merging and branching capabilities
• Proprietary lock-in to Microsoft stack
• No longer under active development

Plastic SCM

Pros

• Very fast and scalable
• Powerful merging capabilities
• Easy to set up and use
• Good integration with IDEs
• Cross-platform support

Cons

• Less flexible than Git
• Weaker community than Git
• Proprietary license

Pricing Comparison

Microsoft Visual SourceSafe

• One-time Purchase
• Subscription-Based (for some versions)

Plastic SCM

• Free
• Subscription-Based