mlocate vs DocFetcher

Professional comparison and analysis to help you choose the right software solution for your needs. Compare features, pricing, pros & cons, and make an informed decision.

mlocate icon
mlocate
DocFetcher icon
DocFetcher

Expert Analysis & Comparison

Struggling to choose between mlocate and DocFetcher? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

mlocate is a Os & Utilities solution with tags like file-search, locate-files, find-files.

It boasts features such as Fast file lookup using filename database, Supports regular expressions for flexible searches, Database updated automatically in background, Handles files moved or deleted after database update, Ignores binary files by default to avoid slow searches, Indexes paths as well as filenames for more targeted results and pros including Very fast compared to searching filesystem directly, Powerful regex support for complex queries, Keeps index updated automatically, Finds files even if moved/renamed after indexing, Lightweight and low system resource usage.

On the other hand, DocFetcher is a Office & Productivity product tagged with documents, search, indexing, desktop.

Its standout features include Full text search, Indexing of common file types, Fast keyword searching, Support for multiple platforms, Open source codebase, and it shines with pros like Free and open source, Easy to use interface, Fast and accurate search results, Lightweight and low resource usage, Customizable to user needs.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

Why Compare mlocate and DocFetcher?

When evaluating mlocate versus DocFetcher, both solutions serve different needs within the os & utilities ecosystem. This comparison helps determine which solution aligns with your specific requirements and technical approach.

Market Position & Industry Recognition

mlocate and DocFetcher have established themselves in the os & utilities market. Key areas include file-search, locate-files, find-files.

Technical Architecture & Implementation

The architectural differences between mlocate and DocFetcher significantly impact implementation and maintenance approaches. Related technologies include file-search, locate-files, find-files.

Integration & Ecosystem

Both solutions integrate with various tools and platforms. Common integration points include file-search, locate-files and documents, search.

Decision Framework

Consider your technical requirements, team expertise, and integration needs when choosing between mlocate and DocFetcher. You might also explore file-search, locate-files, find-files for alternative approaches.

Feature mlocate DocFetcher
Overall Score N/A N/A
Primary Category Os & Utilities Office & Productivity
Target Users Developers, QA Engineers QA Teams, Non-technical Users
Deployment Self-hosted, Cloud Cloud-based, SaaS
Learning Curve Moderate to Steep Easy to Moderate

Product Overview

mlocate
mlocate

Description: mlocate is a command line utility in Linux for quickly locating files based on their name or a regular expression. It maintains a database of files and directories to allow fast lookups compared to searching the whole file system.

Type: Open Source Test Automation Framework

Founded: 2011

Primary Use: Mobile app testing automation

Supported Platforms: iOS, Android, Windows

DocFetcher
DocFetcher

Description: DocFetcher is an open source desktop search application for Windows, Linux and Mac OS X that indexes documents on your computer and allows fast keyword searching.

Type: Cloud-based Test Automation Platform

Founded: 2015

Primary Use: Web, mobile, and API testing

Supported Platforms: Web, iOS, Android, API

Key Features Comparison

mlocate
mlocate Features
  • Fast file lookup using filename database
  • Supports regular expressions for flexible searches
  • Database updated automatically in background
  • Handles files moved or deleted after database update
  • Ignores binary files by default to avoid slow searches
  • Indexes paths as well as filenames for more targeted results
DocFetcher
DocFetcher Features
  • Full text search
  • Indexing of common file types
  • Fast keyword searching
  • Support for multiple platforms
  • Open source codebase

Pros & Cons Analysis

mlocate
mlocate
Pros
  • Very fast compared to searching filesystem directly
  • Powerful regex support for complex queries
  • Keeps index updated automatically
  • Finds files even if moved/renamed after indexing
  • Lightweight and low system resource usage
Cons
  • Not useful if filename unknown
  • Database can get large for huge filesystems
  • Must update database manually after major filesystem changes
  • Not designed for interactive browsing of files
DocFetcher
DocFetcher
Pros
  • Free and open source
  • Easy to use interface
  • Fast and accurate search results
  • Lightweight and low resource usage
  • Customizable to user needs
Cons
  • Limited file type support
  • No online sync or collaboration features
  • Requires manual indexing
  • Basic interface lacking visual appeal

Pricing Comparison

mlocate
mlocate
  • Open Source
DocFetcher
DocFetcher
  • Open Source

Get More Information

Ready to Make Your Decision?

Explore more software comparisons and find the perfect solution for your needs