Mockable vs WireMock

Struggling to choose between Mockable and WireMock? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Mockable is a Development solution with tags like mocking, testing, rest-api, http-responses.

It boasts features such as Create mock APIs with custom responses, Simulate different HTTP status codes and response times, Share mock APIs with other developers, Import APIs from Postman collections, Monitor request history and analytics, Integrations with CI/CD pipelines and pros including Speeds up development by eliminating dependency on real backends, Allows testing against simulated responses, Great for collaboration between frontend and backend teams, Simple and intuitive interface, Free tier available.

On the other hand, WireMock is a Development product tagged with mocking, stubbing, http, testing.

Its standout features include HTTP request stubbing, Request matching and response templating, Record and playback of stub mappings, Proxying, HTTPS support, Customizable request matching, Customizable response generation, Self-contained executable JAR with embedded web server, and it shines with pros like Enables testing against simulated APIs without needing real endpoints, Faster and more flexible than mocking HTTP interactions in unit tests, Avoids flakiness when testing against remote endpoints, Simplifies testing of edge cases and failure modes, Enables working offline.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

Mockable

Mockable

Mockable is an online API mocking tool that allows developers to quickly create simulated HTTP responses for REST API endpoints without needing a real backend. It makes it easy to mock APIs for development and testing.

Categories:
mocking testing rest-api http-responses

Mockable Features

  1. Create mock APIs with custom responses
  2. Simulate different HTTP status codes and response times
  3. Share mock APIs with other developers
  4. Import APIs from Postman collections
  5. Monitor request history and analytics
  6. Integrations with CI/CD pipelines

Pricing

  • Freemium
  • Subscription-Based

Pros

Speeds up development by eliminating dependency on real backends

Allows testing against simulated responses

Great for collaboration between frontend and backend teams

Simple and intuitive interface

Free tier available

Cons

Limited functionality compared to full API testing tools

No native support for SOAP or GraphQL APIs

No mocking of push APIs or webhooks

Free tier has usage limits

No built-in API documentation features


WireMock

WireMock

WireMock is an open source tool for simulating HTTP-based APIs during development. It enables mocking and stubbing of APIs and servers before they are fully developed to enable faster testing of applications that integrate with them.

Categories:
mocking stubbing http testing

WireMock Features

  1. HTTP request stubbing
  2. Request matching and response templating
  3. Record and playback of stub mappings
  4. Proxying
  5. HTTPS support
  6. Customizable request matching
  7. Customizable response generation
  8. Self-contained executable JAR with embedded web server

Pricing

  • Open Source

Pros

Enables testing against simulated APIs without needing real endpoints

Faster and more flexible than mocking HTTP interactions in unit tests

Avoids flakiness when testing against remote endpoints

Simplifies testing of edge cases and failure modes

Enables working offline

Cons

Additional component to install and run during testing

Can make tests more brittle if stubs drift from actual API behavior

Stubbing complex APIs can require significant upfront effort