mustache vs Dust.js

Struggling to choose between mustache and Dust.js? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

mustache is a Development solution with tags like logicless, templates, mustache, view-rendering.

It boasts features such as Logic-less template syntax, Expands tags using values from hash/object, Used for HTML, config files, source code, Supports templates with placeholders only and pros including Simple syntax without logic, Fast rendering performance, Language/platform agnostic, Large community and ecosystem.

On the other hand, Dust.js is a Development product tagged with templating, clientside, serverside.

Its standout features include Template inheritance, Automatic escaping for security, Asynchronous rendering, Streaming, Client-side and server-side rendering, Partial templates, Conditionals and loops, Helpers for formatting, Extensible with custom helpers and filters, and it shines with pros like Lightweight and fast, Secure against XSS attacks, Good documentation, Active community support, Integration with Express.js for server-side rendering, Streaming allows progressive rendering.

Feature	mustache	Dust.js
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Development	Development

Product Overview

mustache

Description: Mustache is a logic-less template syntax that works by expanding tags in a template using values provided in a hash or object. It is often used for HTML, config files, source code - anything with logic-less templates.

Dust.js

Description: Dust.js is a lightweight JavaScript templating library for both client-side and server-side rendering. It has a simple, easy-to-read syntax and aims to provide complete control of HTML output while being highly extensible.

Key Features Comparison

mustache Features

• Logic-less template syntax
• Expands tags using values from hash/object
• Used for HTML, config files, source code
• Supports templates with placeholders only

Dust.js Features

• Template inheritance
• Automatic escaping for security
• Asynchronous rendering
• Streaming
• Client-side and server-side rendering
• Partial templates
• Conditionals and loops
• Helpers for formatting
• Extensible with custom helpers and filters

Pros & Cons Analysis

mustache

Pros

• Simple syntax without logic
• Fast rendering performance
• Language/platform agnostic
• Large community and ecosystem

Cons

• Limited functionality without logic
• Less flexible compared to full templating systems
• Can get complex for large templates
• Limited error handling

Dust.js

Pros

• Lightweight and fast
• Secure against XSS attacks
• Good documentation
• Active community support
• Integration with Express.js for server-side rendering
• Streaming allows progressive rendering

Cons

• Less flexible compared to some other templating engines
• Limited adoption outside of LinkedIn where it originated
• Requires learning non-standard syntax

Pricing Comparison

mustache

• Open Source
• Free

Dust.js

• Open Source