Nagios vs Centreon Enterprise Server

Struggling to choose between Nagios and Centreon Enterprise Server? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Nagios is a Network & Admin solution with tags like monitoring, alerting, uptime, server.

It boasts features such as Monitoring of network services (HTTP, SMTP, POP3, ICMP, etc), Monitoring of host resources (processor load, disk usage, etc), Simple plugin design for easy extensibility, Alerting and notification when problems arise, Web interface for viewing current network status, alerts and reports, Support for SNMP polling for switch/router monitoring, Remote monitoring capabilities with secure tunneling and pros including Open source and free, Highly customizable and extensible, Wide range of plugins available, Alerting helps identify issues quickly, Good community support.

On the other hand, Centreon Enterprise Server is a Network & Admin product tagged with monitoring, infrastructure, availability, open-source.

Its standout features include Real-time monitoring and alerting, Customizable dashboards and reporting, Automatic discovery of IT assets, Event correlation and root cause analysis, Integration with multiple data sources, Centralized configuration management, Scalable distributed monitoring architecture, REST APIs for integration and automation, and it shines with pros like Open source and free to use, Highly customizable and extensible, Large extension ecosystem and community support, Supports monitoring of diverse environments and technologies, Intuitive web interface for easy access and visibility, Available as software or virtual appliance for quick deployment.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

Nagios

Nagios

Nagios is an open-source monitoring system that allows administrators to monitor network infrastructure like servers, switches, applications, and services. It can notify users when issues arise and help identify problems in a timely manner.

Categories:
monitoring alerting uptime server

Nagios Features

  1. Monitoring of network services (HTTP, SMTP, POP3, ICMP, etc)
  2. Monitoring of host resources (processor load, disk usage, etc)
  3. Simple plugin design for easy extensibility
  4. Alerting and notification when problems arise
  5. Web interface for viewing current network status, alerts and reports
  6. Support for SNMP polling for switch/router monitoring
  7. Remote monitoring capabilities with secure tunneling

Pricing

  • Open Source

Pros

Open source and free

Highly customizable and extensible

Wide range of plugins available

Alerting helps identify issues quickly

Good community support

Cons

Steep learning curve

Complex configuration

No native support for monitoring Windows systems

Difficult to scale to large environments


Centreon Enterprise Server

Centreon Enterprise Server

Centreon Enterprise Server is an open source IT infrastructure and network monitoring platform. It provides visibility into systems, networks, and infrastructure to detect problems and ensure high availability.

Categories:
monitoring infrastructure availability open-source

Centreon Enterprise Server Features

  1. Real-time monitoring and alerting
  2. Customizable dashboards and reporting
  3. Automatic discovery of IT assets
  4. Event correlation and root cause analysis
  5. Integration with multiple data sources
  6. Centralized configuration management
  7. Scalable distributed monitoring architecture
  8. REST APIs for integration and automation

Pricing

  • Open Source
  • Subscription-Based

Pros

Open source and free to use

Highly customizable and extensible

Large extension ecosystem and community support

Supports monitoring of diverse environments and technologies

Intuitive web interface for easy access and visibility

Available as software or virtual appliance for quick deployment

Cons

Steep learning curve

Complex setup and configuration

Requires expertise to customize and extend

Limited native support for some monitoring tools

Does not include commercial support by default