Oatpp vs Silicon web framework

Struggling to choose between Oatpp and Silicon web framework? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Oatpp is a Development solution with tags like c, rest, web-services, high-performance.

It boasts features such as Object-oriented design, Built on top of POSIX and boost::asio, Supports HTTP/1.1 and HTTP/2, Asynchronous request handling, Modular components, Route matching, JSON parsing and serialization, Database connectivity, Test framework and pros including High performance, Flexible and modular architecture, Active development and support, Thorough documentation, Built-in testing framework, Supports latest C++ standards.

On the other hand, Silicon web framework is a Development product tagged with python, web-framework, orm, templating.

Its standout features include Full-stack web framework, Built-in ORM for database access, Templating engine for server-side rendering, Async task queue support via Celery integration, Caching support via Redis integration, Modular design allowing customization, Built-in admin interface generator, Authentication and authorization modules, Production-ready with WSGI server integration, and it shines with pros like Full-featured out of the box, Large ecosystem of third-party packages, High scalability potential, Fast development with batteries-included philosophy, Thorough documentation and large community support.

Feature	Oatpp	Silicon web framework
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Development	Development

Product Overview

Oatpp

Description: Oatpp is an open-source C++ web framework for developing high-performance web services. It uses modern C++ practices and provides an object-oriented API for building REST APIs and web apps.

Silicon web framework

Description: Silicon is an open-source, full-stack Python web framework designed for building scalable web applications. It includes an ORM, templating engine, and integrations with common tools like PostgreSQL, Redis, and Celery.

Key Features Comparison

Oatpp Features

• Object-oriented design
• Built on top of POSIX and boost::asio
• Supports HTTP/1.1 and HTTP/2
• Asynchronous request handling
• Modular components
• Route matching
• JSON parsing and serialization
• Database connectivity
• Test framework

Silicon web framework Features

• Full-stack web framework
• Built-in ORM for database access
• Templating engine for server-side rendering
• Async task queue support via Celery integration
• Caching support via Redis integration
• Modular design allowing customization
• Built-in admin interface generator
• Authentication and authorization modules
• Production-ready with WSGI server integration

Pros & Cons Analysis

Oatpp

Pros

• High performance
• Flexible and modular architecture
• Active development and support
• Thorough documentation
• Built-in testing framework
• Supports latest C++ standards

Cons

• Steeper learning curve for C++
• Less ecosystem than other web frameworks
• Not as beginner friendly as other options

Silicon web framework

Pros

• Full-featured out of the box
• Large ecosystem of third-party packages
• High scalability potential
• Fast development with batteries-included philosophy
• Thorough documentation and large community support

Cons

• Steep learning curve for beginners
• Complex configuration can be daunting initially
• Not as lightweight as some other Python web frameworks
• Upgrading between major versions can require code changes

Pricing Comparison

Oatpp

• Open Source

Silicon web framework

• Open Source