onpatient vs Open mHealth

Struggling to choose between onpatient and Open mHealth? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

onpatient is a Remote Work & Education solution with tags like patient-engagement, telehealth, video-visits, messaging, scheduling, surveys.

It boasts features such as Video Visits, Patient Messaging, Self-Scheduling, Patient Surveys, Telehealth Platform, Patient Engagement and pros including Facilitates digital patient-provider interaction, Offers a range of patient engagement features, Enables telehealth capabilities.

On the other hand, Open mHealth is a Health & Fitness product tagged with opensource, mobile, health, data, integration, interoperability.

Its standout features include Open APIs and schemas for mobile health data, Tools and libraries for building mobile health apps, Integrates mobile health data with electronic health records, Supports common mobile health data types like physical activity, sleep, etc, Modular architecture to connect multiple data sources and health platforms, and it shines with pros like Promotes interoperability between mHealth apps and health systems, Enables mobile health data to be shared securely, Open source and freely available, Backed by non-profit open mHealth to drive adoption, Designed specifically for mobile health use cases.

Feature	onpatient	Open mHealth
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Remote Work & Education	Health & Fitness

Product Overview

onpatient

Description: OnPatient is a patient engagement and telehealth platform that allows healthcare providers to digitally interact with patients. It features video visits, patient messaging, self-scheduling, patient surveys, and more.

Open mHealth

Description: Open mHealth is an open-source platform for mobile health data integration. It provides APIs and data schemas to facilitate interoperability between mobile health apps and electronic health record systems.

Key Features Comparison

onpatient Features

• Video Visits
• Patient Messaging
• Self-Scheduling
• Patient Surveys
• Telehealth Platform
• Patient Engagement

Open mHealth Features

• Open APIs and schemas for mobile health data
• Tools and libraries for building mobile health apps
• Integrates mobile health data with electronic health records
• Supports common mobile health data types like physical activity, sleep, etc
• Modular architecture to connect multiple data sources and health platforms

Pros & Cons Analysis

onpatient

Pros

• Facilitates digital patient-provider interaction
• Offers a range of patient engagement features
• Enables telehealth capabilities

Cons

• Limited information on integrations with other healthcare systems
• Pricing details not readily available

Open mHealth

Pros

• Promotes interoperability between mHealth apps and health systems
• Enables mobile health data to be shared securely
• Open source and freely available
• Backed by non-profit open mHealth to drive adoption
• Designed specifically for mobile health use cases

Cons

• Limited adoption so far
• Requires technical expertise to implement
• Not a complete end-to-end mHealth solution
• APIs and schemas still evolving
• Does not include user interface or mobile apps

Pricing Comparison

onpatient

• Subscription-Based

Open mHealth

• Open Source