Struggling to choose between OrbitDB and BigMemory? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.
OrbitDB is a Development solution with tags like decentralized, peertopeer, ipfs, distributed-web.
It boasts features such as Decentralized database, Built on IPFS, Event log for database changes, Supports CRUD operations, Access control lists, Queryable database API and pros including Decentralization provides censorship resistance, Data is distributed across nodes, Immutable append-only log, Fine-grained access control, Interoperable with other IPFS tools.
On the other hand, BigMemory is a Development product tagged with caching, data-management, low-latency.
Its standout features include Distributed in-memory data storage, Automatic data eviction and loading, Read/write caching for databases, Support for terabytes of data, Integration with Hadoop and Spark, High availability through replication and failover, and it shines with pros like Very fast data access and throughput, Reduces load on databases, Scales horizontally, Lowers infrastructure costs by using RAM instead of disks, Supports both Java and .NET platforms.
To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.
OrbitDB is a decentralized peer-to-peer database that allows developers to build decentralized applications. It works on top of IPFS, providing an API for managing databases on the distributed web.
BigMemory is an in-memory data management system that provides a fast, scalable cache and data store for applications. It allows storing terabytes of data in memory for low-latency data access.