Pelican vs Static Site Boilerplate

Struggling to choose between Pelican and Static Site Boilerplate? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Pelican is a Development solution with tags like python, static, site-generator, blogging.

It boasts features such as Static site generator, Supports Markdown and reStructuredText content, Themes and plugins allow customization, Built-in support for code syntax highlighting, Automatic content pagination, Supports tags, categories and archives, Easy to deploy - generates static HTML files, Good documentation and active community and pros including Flexible and extensible, Good performance for static sites, Lots of themes and plugins available, Easy to get started for beginners, Integrates well with Python ecosystem.

On the other hand, Static Site Boilerplate is a Development product tagged with starter-kit, static-site, boilerplate, webpack, postcss, es6.

Its standout features include Modular file structure, Sass styling, Responsive design, Webpack bundling, PostCSS processing, ES6 support, Performance optimizations, and it shines with pros like Open source, Modern build tools, Modular and scalable, Good for static sites, Fast load times.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

Pelican

Pelican

Pelican is a popular open source static site generator written in Python. It is designed for flexibility and extensibility, allowing developers to customize it for different projects. Pelican takes Markdown or reST content and generates complete static HTML websites that can be easily deployed.

Categories:
python static site-generator blogging

Pelican Features

  1. Static site generator
  2. Supports Markdown and reStructuredText content
  3. Themes and plugins allow customization
  4. Built-in support for code syntax highlighting
  5. Automatic content pagination
  6. Supports tags, categories and archives
  7. Easy to deploy - generates static HTML files
  8. Good documentation and active community

Pricing

  • Open Source

Pros

Flexible and extensible

Good performance for static sites

Lots of themes and plugins available

Easy to get started for beginners

Integrates well with Python ecosystem

Cons

Not ideal for very large or complex sites

Steeper learning curve than some website builders

Limited built-in CMS capabilities

Requires command line usage for many tasks


Static Site Boilerplate

Static Site Boilerplate

Static Site Boilerplate is an open-source starter kit for building static websites using modern tools like Webpack, PostCSS, and ES6. It provides a modular structure, Sass styling, responsive design, and optimizations for performance.

Categories:
starter-kit static-site boilerplate webpack postcss es6

Static Site Boilerplate Features

  1. Modular file structure
  2. Sass styling
  3. Responsive design
  4. Webpack bundling
  5. PostCSS processing
  6. ES6 support
  7. Performance optimizations

Pricing

  • Open Source

Pros

Open source

Modern build tools

Modular and scalable

Good for static sites

Fast load times

Cons

Requires build step

Some complexity in configuration

Not ideal for complex apps

Limited docs and support