Percy by BrowserStack vs Agola

Struggling to choose between Percy by BrowserStack and Agola? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Percy by BrowserStack is a Development solution with tags like visual-testing, regression-testing, ui-testing, github-integration.

It boasts features such as Automated visual testing, Integrations with GitHub, Bitbucket, Jira, and other development tools, Visual diffs and snapshots for UI changes, Collaborative review and approval workflows, Cross-browser and responsive testing, Customizable test suites and baselines, Detailed reporting and analytics and pros including Streamlines the visual review process, Catches UI issues early in the development cycle, Improves collaboration and communication among team members, Provides comprehensive visual testing coverage, Integrates with existing development workflows.

On the other hand, Agola is a Development product tagged with automation, build, test, deploy, release, pipeline, caching, artifact-management, configuration-as-code.

Its standout features include Configuration as code, Built-in caching, Artifact management, Integrations with various tools, Automated build pipelines, Automated testing, Automated deployments, Automated releases, and it shines with pros like Open source and free, Easy to configure pipelines as code, Good performance with built-in caching, Integrates well with many tools, Automates and simplifies software workflows.

Feature	Percy by BrowserStack	Agola
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Development	Development

Product Overview

Percy by BrowserStack

Description: Percy is a visual testing and review platform that integrates with GitHub and other development tools to let teams automate visual reviews and catch UI issues before releasing code to production.

Agola

Description: Agola is an open-source platform for automating software development workflows. It allows you to define pipelines to build, test, deploy, and release your software projects. Key features include configuration as code, built-in caching, artifact management, and integrations with various tools.

Key Features Comparison

Percy by BrowserStack Features

• Automated visual testing
• Integrations with GitHub, Bitbucket, Jira, and other development tools
• Visual diffs and snapshots for UI changes
• Collaborative review and approval workflows
• Cross-browser and responsive testing
• Customizable test suites and baselines
• Detailed reporting and analytics

Agola Features

• Configuration as code
• Built-in caching
• Artifact management
• Integrations with various tools
• Automated build pipelines
• Automated testing
• Automated deployments
• Automated releases

Pros & Cons Analysis

Percy by BrowserStack

Pros

• Streamlines the visual review process
• Catches UI issues early in the development cycle
• Improves collaboration and communication among team members
• Provides comprehensive visual testing coverage
• Integrates with existing development workflows

Cons

• Requires a learning curve for setup and configuration
• Pricing may be higher for larger teams or enterprises
• Potential compatibility issues with certain development tools

Agola

Pros

• Open source and free
• Easy to configure pipelines as code
• Good performance with built-in caching
• Integrates well with many tools
• Automates and simplifies software workflows

Cons

• Limited documentation
• Steep learning curve
• Not as feature rich as some commercial options

Pricing Comparison

Percy by BrowserStack

• Subscription-Based

Agola

• Open Source