Percy by BrowserStack vs Bitten

Struggling to choose between Percy by BrowserStack and Bitten? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Percy by BrowserStack is a Development solution with tags like visual-testing, regression-testing, ui-testing, github-integration.

It boasts features such as Automated visual testing, Integrations with GitHub, Bitbucket, Jira, and other development tools, Visual diffs and snapshots for UI changes, Collaborative review and approval workflows, Cross-browser and responsive testing, Customizable test suites and baselines, Detailed reporting and analytics and pros including Streamlines the visual review process, Catches UI issues early in the development cycle, Improves collaboration and communication among team members, Provides comprehensive visual testing coverage, Integrates with existing development workflows.

On the other hand, Bitten is a Development product tagged with test-management, automated-testing, open-source.

Its standout features include Test case management, Test scheduling, Test execution tracking, Test reporting and metrics, Integration with source control systems, Web-based interface, and it shines with pros like Open source and free, Integrates with popular SCMs like Git, Mercurial, and Subversion, Web-based for easy access, Automated test tracking and metrics, Active development community.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

Percy by BrowserStack

Percy by BrowserStack

Percy is a visual testing and review platform that integrates with GitHub and other development tools to let teams automate visual reviews and catch UI issues before releasing code to production.

Categories:
visual-testing regression-testing ui-testing github-integration

Percy by BrowserStack Features

  1. Automated visual testing
  2. Integrations with GitHub, Bitbucket, Jira, and other development tools
  3. Visual diffs and snapshots for UI changes
  4. Collaborative review and approval workflows
  5. Cross-browser and responsive testing
  6. Customizable test suites and baselines
  7. Detailed reporting and analytics

Pricing

  • Subscription-Based

Pros

Streamlines the visual review process

Catches UI issues early in the development cycle

Improves collaboration and communication among team members

Provides comprehensive visual testing coverage

Integrates with existing development workflows

Cons

Requires a learning curve for setup and configuration

Pricing may be higher for larger teams or enterprises

Potential compatibility issues with certain development tools


Bitten

Bitten

Bitten is an open source web-based test management system developed by Mozilla. It integrates with popular source code management systems to provide tracking, scheduling, and reporting of automated tests for software projects.

Categories:
test-management automated-testing open-source

Bitten Features

  1. Test case management
  2. Test scheduling
  3. Test execution tracking
  4. Test reporting and metrics
  5. Integration with source control systems
  6. Web-based interface

Pricing

  • Open Source

Pros

Open source and free

Integrates with popular SCMs like Git, Mercurial, and Subversion

Web-based for easy access

Automated test tracking and metrics

Active development community

Cons

Limited adoption outside of Mozilla projects

Setup and configuration can be complex

Only supports Python-based tests

No native mobile or desktop apps