Phaser vs EaselJS

Struggling to choose between Phaser and EaselJS? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Phaser is a Games solution with tags like html5, javascript, game-engine, 2d-games.

It boasts features such as WebGL and Canvas rendering, Built-in physics engine, Asset loading, Input handling, Cameras, Particles, Time-stepped updates, Scenes and transitions and pros including Open source, Good documentation, Large community, Active development, Permissive license, Good performance.

On the other hand, EaselJS is a Development product tagged with canvas, graphics, animation, interactivity.

Its standout features include Canvas rendering, Shape and bitmap drawing, Built-in shape library, Sprite sheet animation, Mouse and touch interactions, Filters and blend modes, Text and bitmap fonts, and it shines with pros like Lightweight and high performance, Cross-browser compatibility, Active development and support, Integrates well with other CreateJS libraries, Open source and free to use.

Feature	Phaser	EaselJS
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Games	Development

Product Overview

Phaser

Description: Phaser is a fast, free, and fun open source HTML5 game framework. It offers WebGL and Canvas rendering across desktop and mobile web browsers. Phaser is ideal for making 2D games like platformers, top-down shooters, puzzle games, and more.

EaselJS

Description: EaselJS is a JavaScript library for building high-performance interactive 2D content using HTML5 Canvas. It provides an easy-to-use API for animation, interactivity, and graphic design capabilities.

Key Features Comparison

Phaser Features

• WebGL and Canvas rendering
• Built-in physics engine
• Asset loading
• Input handling
• Cameras
• Particles
• Time-stepped updates
• Scenes and transitions

EaselJS Features

• Canvas rendering
• Shape and bitmap drawing
• Built-in shape library
• Sprite sheet animation
• Mouse and touch interactions
• Filters and blend modes
• Text and bitmap fonts

Pros & Cons Analysis

Phaser

Pros

• Open source
• Good documentation
• Large community
• Active development
• Permissive license
• Good performance

Cons

• Steep learning curve
• Not ideal for complex 3D games
• Limited UI components
• No built-in networking

EaselJS

Pros

• Lightweight and high performance
• Cross-browser compatibility
• Active development and support
• Integrates well with other CreateJS libraries
• Open source and free to use

Cons

• Limited documentation
• Steep learning curve
• Not ideal for complex applications
• No 3D support

Pricing Comparison

Phaser

• Open Source

EaselJS

• Open Source
• Free