picocom vs dterm (terminal emulator)

Struggling to choose between picocom and dterm (terminal emulator)? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

picocom is a Os & Utilities solution with tags like serial, microcontroller, minimal, dumbterminal.

It boasts features such as Minimal dumb-terminal emulation, Serial port terminal program, Supports baud rates from 50 to 460800, Simple flow control with RTS/CTS, Hex dump traffic, Basic built-in help, No dependencies other than base C library and pros including Lightweight and fast, Easy to use, Works on most Linux systems, Supports many common serial protocols, Open source with active development.

On the other hand, dterm (terminal emulator) is a Os & Utilities product tagged with terminal, emulator, linux, unix, opensource.

Its standout features include Unicode support, Multiple tabs, Customizable appearance, SSH and telnet support, Copy and paste support, Scripting and automation, and it shines with pros like Lightweight and fast, Highly customizable, Open source and free, Supports many terminal features, Available on many Linux distros.

Feature	picocom	dterm (terminal emulator)
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Os & Utilities	Os & Utilities

Product Overview

picocom

Description: Picocom is a minimal dumb-terminal emulation program for Linux systems. It is useful for communicating with serial devices such as microcontrollers.

dterm (terminal emulator)

Description: dterm is an open-source terminal emulator for Linux and UNIX-like operating systems. It aims to provide a minimal, customizable terminal with modern features like Unicode support, colors, tabs, and more.

Key Features Comparison

picocom Features

• Minimal dumb-terminal emulation
• Serial port terminal program
• Supports baud rates from 50 to 460800
• Simple flow control with RTS/CTS
• Hex dump traffic
• Basic built-in help
• No dependencies other than base C library

dterm (terminal emulator) Features

• Unicode support
• Multiple tabs
• Customizable appearance
• SSH and telnet support
• Copy and paste support
• Scripting and automation

Pros & Cons Analysis

picocom

Pros

• Lightweight and fast
• Easy to use
• Works on most Linux systems
• Supports many common serial protocols
• Open source with active development

Cons

• Limited feature set compared to full terminal emulators
• No GUI interface
• Linux only
• Limited documentation

dterm (terminal emulator)

Pros

• Lightweight and fast
• Highly customizable
• Open source and free
• Supports many terminal features
• Available on many Linux distros

Cons

• Lacks some features of more full-featured emulators
• Configuration can be complex for new users
• Limited platform support (Linux only)

Pricing Comparison

picocom

• Open Source

dterm (terminal emulator)

• Open Source