PixiJS vs EaselJS

Struggling to choose between PixiJS and EaselJS? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

PixiJS is a Development solution with tags like 2d, webgl, graphics, canvas, rendering.

It boasts features such as WebGL renderer, Canvas renderer, SVG renderer, Sprite support, Texture support, Interaction support, Animation support, Full scene graph, Plugin support and pros including Fast performance, Lightweight, Good documentation, Active community, Open source, Compatible with major browsers, Supports multiple renderers.

On the other hand, EaselJS is a Development product tagged with canvas, graphics, animation, interactivity.

Its standout features include Canvas rendering, Shape and bitmap drawing, Built-in shape library, Sprite sheet animation, Mouse and touch interactions, Filters and blend modes, Text and bitmap fonts, and it shines with pros like Lightweight and high performance, Cross-browser compatibility, Active development and support, Integrates well with other CreateJS libraries, Open source and free to use.

Feature	PixiJS	EaselJS
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Development	Development

Product Overview

PixiJS

Description: PixiJS is a fast, lightweight 2D WebGL renderer optimized for beautiful interactive graphics. It offers a full scene graph, canvas and svg renderer, texture support, and plugin support.

EaselJS

Description: EaselJS is a JavaScript library for building high-performance interactive 2D content using HTML5 Canvas. It provides an easy-to-use API for animation, interactivity, and graphic design capabilities.

Key Features Comparison

PixiJS Features

• WebGL renderer
• Canvas renderer
• SVG renderer
• Sprite support
• Texture support
• Interaction support
• Animation support
• Full scene graph
• Plugin support

EaselJS Features

• Canvas rendering
• Shape and bitmap drawing
• Built-in shape library
• Sprite sheet animation
• Mouse and touch interactions
• Filters and blend modes
• Text and bitmap fonts

Pros & Cons Analysis

PixiJS

Pros

• Fast performance
• Lightweight
• Good documentation
• Active community
• Open source
• Compatible with major browsers
• Supports multiple renderers

Cons

• Steep learning curve
• Limited 3D support
• Not ideal for complex 3D games
• Less flexible than some other graphics engines

EaselJS

Pros

• Lightweight and high performance
• Cross-browser compatibility
• Active development and support
• Integrates well with other CreateJS libraries
• Open source and free to use

Cons

• Limited documentation
• Steep learning curve
• Not ideal for complex applications
• No 3D support

Pricing Comparison

PixiJS

• Open Source

EaselJS

• Open Source
• Free