Plastic SCM vs Fossil

Struggling to choose between Plastic SCM and Fossil? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Plastic SCM is a Development solution with tags like source-control, git, mercurial, svn, versioning.

It boasts features such as Distributed version control, High performance, Flexible branching models, Integrates with IDEs like Visual Studio, Supports Windows, Linux and Mac and pros including Very fast and scalable, Powerful merging capabilities, Easy to set up and use, Good integration with IDEs, Cross-platform support.

On the other hand, Fossil is a Development product tagged with opensource, distributed, version-control, bug-tracking, wiki, tech-notes, simplicity, security.

Its standout features include Distributed version control, Integrated bug tracking, Wiki, Tech notes, Web interface, and it shines with pros like Simple and easy to use, Lightweight and fast, Good for small projects, Built-in wiki and bug tracking, No network access required for most operations.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.