Plastic SCM vs Perforce

Struggling to choose between Plastic SCM and Perforce? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Plastic SCM is a Development solution with tags like source-control, git, mercurial, svn, versioning.

It boasts features such as Distributed version control, High performance, Flexible branching models, Integrates with IDEs like Visual Studio, Supports Windows, Linux and Mac and pros including Very fast and scalable, Powerful merging capabilities, Easy to set up and use, Good integration with IDEs, Cross-platform support.

On the other hand, Perforce is a Development product tagged with source-code, version-control, large-repositories.

Its standout features include Distributed version control, Scalable architecture, Access controls and permissions, Branching and merging, Shelving changes, Revert and rollback, Code review and approvals, Integrations and APIs, Build automation, and it shines with pros like Robust access controls and security, High performance with large codebases, Powerful branching capabilities, Detailed changelists and annotations, Numerous integrations and APIs, Mature and reliable system.

Feature	Plastic SCM	Perforce
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Development	Development

Product Overview

Plastic SCM

Description: Plastic SCM is a distributed version control system designed for teams of developers working on Windows, Linux and Mac. It focuses on performance, security, flexibility and ease of use.

Perforce

Description: Perforce is a version control system used primarily by large enterprises to manage source code and other assets during product development. It excels at handling large, complex repositories with huge numbers of revisions.

Key Features Comparison

Plastic SCM Features

• Distributed version control
• High performance
• Flexible branching models
• Integrates with IDEs like Visual Studio
• Supports Windows, Linux and Mac

Perforce Features

• Distributed version control
• Scalable architecture
• Access controls and permissions
• Branching and merging
• Shelving changes
• Revert and rollback
• Code review and approvals
• Integrations and APIs
• Build automation

Pros & Cons Analysis

Plastic SCM

Pros

• Very fast and scalable
• Powerful merging capabilities
• Easy to set up and use
• Good integration with IDEs
• Cross-platform support

Cons

• Less flexible than Git
• Weaker community than Git
• Proprietary license

Perforce

Pros

• Robust access controls and security
• High performance with large codebases
• Powerful branching capabilities
• Detailed changelists and annotations
• Numerous integrations and APIs
• Mature and reliable system

Cons

• Steep learning curve
• Expensive licensing model
• Not ideal for small teams
• Limited native IDE plugins
• Less flexible workflows than Git

Pricing Comparison

Plastic SCM

• Free
• Subscription-Based

Perforce

• Subscription-Based
• Pay-As-You-Go
• Custom Pricing