Process Monitor vs ltrace

Struggling to choose between Process Monitor and ltrace? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Process Monitor is a Os & Utilities solution with tags like process, monitor, system, utility.

It boasts features such as Real-time monitoring of file system, Registry, process, thread and network activity, Filter and search capabilities to focus on events of interest, Detailed information on event properties, Save log files to analyze events offline, Integration with other Sysinternals tools and pros including Powerful troubleshooting capabilities, Helps identify root causes of system issues, Lightweight and low resource usage, Free and open source.

On the other hand, ltrace is a Development product tagged with library, debugging, tracing, dynamic-linking.

Its standout features include Intercepts and records dynamic library calls made by a process, Can trace calls made by programs to shared libraries, Helps debug issues caused by dynamic linking, Shows parameters passed to library functions and return values, Tracks time spent in each call, and it shines with pros like Lightweight and easy to use for debugging, Does not require modifying or recompiling the target program, Works on most Linux distributions without special setup, Can trace proprietary programs where source code is unavailable.

Feature	Process Monitor	ltrace
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Os & Utilities	Development

Product Overview

Process Monitor

Description: Process Monitor is a advanced monitoring tool for Windows that shows real-time file system, Registry and process/thread activity. It can help identify application conflicts, malware, and performance issues.

ltrace

Description: ltrace is a debugging utility that intercepts and records dynamic library calls which are called by an executed process. It can be used to trace calls made by programs to shared libraries and helps debug issues caused by dynamic linking.

Key Features Comparison

Process Monitor Features

• Real-time monitoring of file system, Registry, process, thread and network activity
• Filter and search capabilities to focus on events of interest
• Detailed information on event properties
• Save log files to analyze events offline
• Integration with other Sysinternals tools

ltrace Features

• Intercepts and records dynamic library calls made by a process
• Can trace calls made by programs to shared libraries
• Helps debug issues caused by dynamic linking
• Shows parameters passed to library functions and return values
• Tracks time spent in each call

Pros & Cons Analysis

Process Monitor

Pros

• Powerful troubleshooting capabilities
• Helps identify root causes of system issues
• Lightweight and low resource usage
• Free and open source

Cons

• Steep learning curve
• Can generate large log files
• Requires technical expertise to utilize fully

ltrace

Pros

• Lightweight and easy to use for debugging
• Does not require modifying or recompiling the target program
• Works on most Linux distributions without special setup
• Can trace proprietary programs where source code is unavailable

Cons

• Only works for dynamic library calls, not static linking
• Can introduce some runtime overhead when tracing
• Does not trace code within libraries themselves
• Limited Windows support compared to Linux

Pricing Comparison

Process Monitor

• Free
• Open Source

ltrace

• Open Source