Propellor vs cdist

Struggling to choose between Propellor and cdist? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Propellor is a Development solution with tags like opensource, haskell, configuration-management, deployment.

It boasts features such as Declarative configuration language, Idempotent system configuration, Manages hosts and services, Written in Haskell and pros including Declarative syntax makes configurations easy to read and maintain, Being purely functional avoids side effects and ensures reproducibility, Type safety prevents many errors.

On the other hand, cdist is a System & Hardware product tagged with configuration-management, automation, python.

Its standout features include Configuration management, Infrastructure as code, Agentless architecture, Parallel execution, Python-based manifests, Customizable via plugins, and it shines with pros like Lightweight and fast, Easy to get started, Powerful templating capabilities, Good for bootstrapping, Active open source community.

Feature	Propellor	cdist
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Development	System & Hardware

Product Overview

Propellor

Description: Propellor is an open-source configuration management tool written in Haskell. It uses a declarative domain-specific language to define system configurations, allowing developers to manage and deploy hosts and services with a high-level syntax.

cdist

Description: cdist is an open source configuration management tool written in Python. It allows system administrators to define the configuration of servers and deploy it to multiple machines in parallel. cdist works by running small scripts called 'manifests' on remote hosts.

Key Features Comparison

Propellor Features

• Declarative configuration language
• Idempotent system configuration
• Manages hosts and services
• Written in Haskell

cdist Features

• Configuration management
• Infrastructure as code
• Agentless architecture
• Parallel execution
• Python-based manifests
• Customizable via plugins

Pros & Cons Analysis

Propellor

Pros

• Declarative syntax makes configurations easy to read and maintain
• Being purely functional avoids side effects and ensures reproducibility
• Type safety prevents many errors

Cons

• Steep learning curve for Haskell syntax
• Limited adoption outside of Haskell community

cdist

Pros

• Lightweight and fast
• Easy to get started
• Powerful templating capabilities
• Good for bootstrapping
• Active open source community

Cons

• Limited adoption and support
• Steep learning curve
• Not ideal for large environments
• No graphical interface

Pricing Comparison

Propellor

• Open Source

cdist

• Open Source