Proxmox Virtual Environment vs Virtkick

Struggling to choose between Proxmox Virtual Environment and Virtkick? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Proxmox Virtual Environment is a Network & Admin solution with tags like virtualization, containers, open-source.

It boasts features such as Kernel-based Virtual Machine (KVM) hypervisor, Linux Containers (LXC), Web-based GUI for management, High Availability (HA) clustering, Live Migration of virtual machines, Software-defined networking, Storage backends like Ceph, ZFS, iSCSI, REST API and pros including Open source and free to use, Good community support, Easy to set up and use, Supports multiple hypervisors and containers, Flexible storage options, Scalable and extensible.

On the other hand, Virtkick is a Network & Admin product tagged with vm-management, cloud, monitoring.

Its standout features include VM provisioning, VM monitoring, VM management, Support for multiple hypervisors, Simple and intuitive UI, Role-based access control, Automated workflows, VM templating, Resource tracking, Alerting and notifications, and it shines with pros like Easy to use interface, Works across multiple hypervisors, Automates VM management, Improves efficiency, Reduces costs, Scalable solution, Good for managing hybrid environments.

Feature	Proxmox Virtual Environment	Virtkick
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Network & Admin	Network & Admin

Product Overview

Proxmox Virtual Environment

Description: Proxmox Virtual Environment (Proxmox VE) is an open-source server virtualization platform based on QEMU/KVM virtualization and LXC containers. It provides a web-based GUI for managing VMs and containers.

Virtkick

Description: Virtkick is a virtual machine management platform designed for managing VMs in the cloud or on-premises. It provides a simple yet powerful interface for provisioning, monitoring, and managing VMs across multiple hypervisors.

Key Features Comparison

Proxmox Virtual Environment Features

• Kernel-based Virtual Machine (KVM) hypervisor
• Linux Containers (LXC)
• Web-based GUI for management
• High Availability (HA) clustering
• Live Migration of virtual machines
• Software-defined networking
• Storage backends like Ceph, ZFS, iSCSI
• REST API

Virtkick Features

• VM provisioning
• VM monitoring
• VM management
• Support for multiple hypervisors
• Simple and intuitive UI
• Role-based access control
• Automated workflows
• VM templating
• Resource tracking
• Alerting and notifications

Pros & Cons Analysis

Proxmox Virtual Environment

Pros

• Open source and free to use
• Good community support
• Easy to set up and use
• Supports multiple hypervisors and containers
• Flexible storage options
• Scalable and extensible

Cons

• Steeper learning curve than other solutions
• Not as feature rich as proprietary alternatives
• Limited third party integrations
• No phone or email technical support

Virtkick

Pros

• Easy to use interface
• Works across multiple hypervisors
• Automates VM management
• Improves efficiency
• Reduces costs
• Scalable solution
• Good for managing hybrid environments

Cons

• Can be complex for beginners
• Limited integrations compared to competitors
• Missing some advanced features
• Steep learning curve
• Can be expensive for large deployments

Pricing Comparison

Proxmox Virtual Environment

• Open Source
• Subscription-Based (Proxmox VE Enterprise)

Virtkick

• Freemium
• Subscription-Based