QF-Test vs Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing

Struggling to choose between QF-Test and Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

QF-Test is a Development solution with tags like gui-testing, java, web, mobile.

It boasts features such as GUI test automation, Cross-platform support, Image-based object recognition, Scripting languages support (Jython, Groovy, JavaScript, Java, VBScript), CI/CD integration, Test reporting and pros including Comprehensive feature set for GUI testing, Support for multiple platforms and languages, Powerful object recognition capabilities, Integrates with CI/CD workflows, Detailed test reports.

On the other hand, Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing is a Development product tagged with functional-testing, web-application-testing, mobile-application-testing, test-automation.

Its standout features include GUI-based test creation, Cross-browser testing, Mobile app testing, API testing, Integrations with CI/CD tools, Scriptless test authoring, Object recognition, Test debugging, and it shines with pros like Supports multiple protocols and environments, Reusable test components, Headless testing, Parallel test execution, Detailed reporting, Open architecture and extensibility.

Feature	QF-Test	Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Development	Development

Product Overview

QF-Test

Description: QF-Test is an automated testing tool used for GUI testing of Java, Web, and Mobile applications. It supports creating test suites using graphical user interface recording, scripting languages, and manual coding.

Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing

Description: Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing is a software testing tool used for functional, regression, and performance testing of web and mobile applications. It supports a range of protocols and allows for automated test creation and execution.

Key Features Comparison

QF-Test Features

• GUI test automation
• Cross-platform support
• Image-based object recognition
• Scripting languages support (Jython, Groovy, JavaScript, Java, VBScript)
• CI/CD integration
• Test reporting

Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing Features

• GUI-based test creation
• Cross-browser testing
• Mobile app testing
• API testing
• Integrations with CI/CD tools
• Scriptless test authoring
• Object recognition
• Test debugging

Pros & Cons Analysis

QF-Test

Pros

• Comprehensive feature set for GUI testing
• Support for multiple platforms and languages
• Powerful object recognition capabilities
• Integrates with CI/CD workflows
• Detailed test reports

Cons

• Steep learning curve
• Scripting requires programming knowledge
• Limited community and support resources
• Higher cost compared to some alternative tools

Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing

Pros

• Supports multiple protocols and environments
• Reusable test components
• Headless testing
• Parallel test execution
• Detailed reporting
• Open architecture and extensibility

Cons

• Steep learning curve
• Expensive licensing
• Script maintenance can be challenging
• Limited support for some modern web technologies

Pricing Comparison

QF-Test

• One-time Purchase
• Subscription-Based

Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing

• Subscription-Based
• Pay-As-You-Go