Retest vs Browserling

Professional comparison and analysis to help you choose the right software solution for your needs. Compare features, pricing, pros & cons, and make an informed decision.

Retest icon
Retest
Browserling icon
Browserling

Expert Analysis & Comparison

Struggling to choose between Retest and Browserling? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Retest is a Development solution with tags like test-automation, regression-testing, web-testing, mobile-testing, crossbrowser-testing, open-source.

It boasts features such as Record and playback tests, Cross-browser testing, Mobile testing, Visual regression testing, CI/CD integration, Test maintenance and debugging, Open source and self-hosted and pros including Easy to use recorder, Supports many browsers and devices, Visual testing for UI changes, Active open source community, Self-hosted option available.

On the other hand, Browserling is a Web Browsers product tagged with crossbrowser, testing, emulation.

Its standout features include Cross-browser testing, Test website on multiple browsers, Emulates various browser and OS configurations, Live interactive browser testing, Screenshot comparisons, Mobile browser testing, Browser version testing, Browser compatibility testing, and it shines with pros like Test across many browsers and OS, No need to install browsers locally, Easy to use interface, Good for quick testing, Affordable pricing.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

Why Compare Retest and Browserling?

When evaluating Retest versus Browserling, both solutions serve different needs within the development ecosystem. This comparison helps determine which solution aligns with your specific requirements and technical approach.

Market Position & Industry Recognition

Retest and Browserling have established themselves in the development market. Key areas include test-automation, regression-testing, web-testing.

Technical Architecture & Implementation

The architectural differences between Retest and Browserling significantly impact implementation and maintenance approaches. Related technologies include test-automation, regression-testing, web-testing, mobile-testing.

Integration & Ecosystem

Both solutions integrate with various tools and platforms. Common integration points include test-automation, regression-testing and crossbrowser, testing.

Decision Framework

Consider your technical requirements, team expertise, and integration needs when choosing between Retest and Browserling. You might also explore test-automation, regression-testing, web-testing for alternative approaches.

Feature Retest Browserling
Overall Score N/A N/A
Primary Category Development Web Browsers
Target Users Developers, QA Engineers QA Teams, Non-technical Users
Deployment Self-hosted, Cloud Cloud-based, SaaS
Learning Curve Moderate to Steep Easy to Moderate

Product Overview

Retest
Retest

Description: Retest is an open-source test automation tool for regression testing web and mobile applications. It supports multiple browsers and devices for cross-browser testing and provides easy test recording, editing, maintenance and debugging.

Type: Open Source Test Automation Framework

Founded: 2011

Primary Use: Mobile app testing automation

Supported Platforms: iOS, Android, Windows

Browserling
Browserling

Description: Browserling is a cross-browser testing tool that allows you to test your website in multiple browsers online. It emulates various browser and operating system configurations so you can see how your site looks and functions across different environments.

Type: Cloud-based Test Automation Platform

Founded: 2015

Primary Use: Web, mobile, and API testing

Supported Platforms: Web, iOS, Android, API

Key Features Comparison

Retest
Retest Features
  • Record and playback tests
  • Cross-browser testing
  • Mobile testing
  • Visual regression testing
  • CI/CD integration
  • Test maintenance and debugging
  • Open source and self-hosted
Browserling
Browserling Features
  • Cross-browser testing
  • Test website on multiple browsers
  • Emulates various browser and OS configurations
  • Live interactive browser testing
  • Screenshot comparisons
  • Mobile browser testing
  • Browser version testing
  • Browser compatibility testing

Pros & Cons Analysis

Retest
Retest
Pros
  • Easy to use recorder
  • Supports many browsers and devices
  • Visual testing for UI changes
  • Active open source community
  • Self-hosted option available
Cons
  • Limited built-in reporting
  • Steep learning curve for advanced scripting
  • Mobile testing requires emulator/simulator
  • Lacks some enterprise-level features
Browserling
Browserling
Pros
  • Test across many browsers and OS
  • No need to install browsers locally
  • Easy to use interface
  • Good for quick testing
  • Affordable pricing
Cons
  • Limited testing time on free plan
  • No automated testing
  • No detailed error logging
  • Not meant for comprehensive testing

Pricing Comparison

Retest
Retest
  • Free
  • Open Source
Browserling
Browserling
  • Freemium
  • Subscription-Based

Get More Information

Ready to Make Your Decision?

Explore more software comparisons and find the perfect solution for your needs