SageMath vs GiNaC

Struggling to choose between SageMath and GiNaC? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

SageMath is a Education & Reference solution with tags like algebra, analysis, calculus, combinatorics, geometry, number-theory, research, teaching.

It boasts features such as Open-source mathematical software system, Supports various mathematical domains like algebra, calculus, combinatorics, numerical computation, Includes libraries like NumPy, SciPy, SymPy, Matplotlib, Interactive notebook interface (Sage Notebook) for calculations, plotting, documentation, Supports code in Python, Cython, C/C++, Fortran and more, Can be used as a server to collaborate with others and pros including Free and open source, Very extensive math functionality, Integrates many existing math libraries, Can be extended by writing new modules, Notebook interface good for learning and documentation.

On the other hand, GiNaC is a Development product tagged with symbolic-math, c, arbitrary-precision, integer, rational, complex-number, matrix.

Its standout features include Symbolic manipulation of mathematical expressions, Arbitrary precision integer and rational arithmetic, Complex number and matrix operations, Customizable expression classes and container types, C++ interface for integration into larger projects, and it shines with pros like Open source with permissive licensing, Good performance compared to other CAS systems, Extensible and customizable codebase, Integrates well into C++ projects, Active development community.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

SageMath

SageMath

SageMath is an open-source mathematics software system licensed under the GPL. It builds on top of many existing open-source packages including NumPy, SciPy, matplotlib, Sympy, and more. It provides an interactive environment and library to support research and teaching across algebra, analysis, calculus, combinatorics, geometry, number theory, and more.

Categories:
algebra analysis calculus combinatorics geometry number-theory research teaching

SageMath Features

  1. Open-source mathematical software system
  2. Supports various mathematical domains like algebra, calculus, combinatorics, numerical computation
  3. Includes libraries like NumPy, SciPy, SymPy, Matplotlib
  4. Interactive notebook interface (Sage Notebook) for calculations, plotting, documentation
  5. Supports code in Python, Cython, C/C++, Fortran and more
  6. Can be used as a server to collaborate with others

Pricing

  • Open Source

Pros

Free and open source

Very extensive math functionality

Integrates many existing math libraries

Can be extended by writing new modules

Notebook interface good for learning and documentation

Cons

Less user friendly than some commercial alternatives

Not as fast as optimized commercial math software

Requires more programming knowledge than some alternatives

Documentation can be technical

Not as polished UI as some alternatives


GiNaC

GiNaC

GiNaC is an open-source computer algebra system for symbolic mathematical computations. It has a C++ interface and supports arbitrary precision integer, rational, complex number, symbolic computation, and matrix operations.

Categories:
symbolic-math c arbitrary-precision integer rational complex-number matrix

GiNaC Features

  1. Symbolic manipulation of mathematical expressions
  2. Arbitrary precision integer and rational arithmetic
  3. Complex number and matrix operations
  4. Customizable expression classes and container types
  5. C++ interface for integration into larger projects

Pricing

  • Open Source

Pros

Open source with permissive licensing

Good performance compared to other CAS systems

Extensible and customizable codebase

Integrates well into C++ projects

Active development community

Cons

Limited documentation and learning resources

Steep learning curve compared to other CAS

Not as full-featured as commercial alternatives

Lacks some advanced symbolic capabilities

User interface not as polished as alternatives