SambaBox vs 389 Directory Server

Struggling to choose between SambaBox and 389 Directory Server? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

SambaBox is a Network & Admin solution with tags like open-source, file-sharing, print-sharing, interoperability, windows, linux, unix.

It boasts features such as File sharing, Print sharing, Interoperability with Windows networks, User and password authentication, Access control lists, Encryption, Virtual file system, Failover and high availability clustering and pros including Free and open source, Cross-platform compatibility, Easy to set up and use, Integrates into AD environments, Allows older hardware to work with modern networks.

On the other hand, 389 Directory Server is a Network & Admin product tagged with ldap, directory, server, replication, security.

Its standout features include LDAP server, Multi-master replication, Access control policies, Password policies, Account lockout, Logging and monitoring, CLI and web-based admin tools, Integration with SSSD and IPA, Schema management, Database backends like LMDB and Berkeley DB, and it shines with pros like Open source, Enterprise-grade performance and scalability, Robust access control and security features, Multi-master replication for high availability, Wide protocol support (LDAP, LDAPI, StartTLS, etc), Backward compatible with Fedora Directory Server.

Feature	SambaBox	389 Directory Server
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Network & Admin	Network & Admin

Product Overview

SambaBox

Description: SambaBox is an open source network file sharing and print sharing software suite that allows Linux/Unix systems to interoperate with Windows file and print sharing protocols. It is an easy way to share files and printers with Windows devices on a home or office network.

389 Directory Server

Description: 389 Directory Server is an open source enterprise-class LDAP server developed by Red Hat. It is fast, scalable, and robust, supporting a wide range of LDAP clients with features like multi-master replication, security, and administrative controls.

Key Features Comparison

SambaBox Features

• File sharing
• Print sharing
• Interoperability with Windows networks
• User and password authentication
• Access control lists
• Encryption
• Virtual file system
• Failover and high availability clustering

389 Directory Server Features

• LDAP server
• Multi-master replication
• Access control policies
• Password policies
• Account lockout
• Logging and monitoring
• CLI and web-based admin tools
• Integration with SSSD and IPA
• Schema management
• Database backends like LMDB and Berkeley DB

Pros & Cons Analysis

SambaBox

Pros

• Free and open source
• Cross-platform compatibility
• Easy to set up and use
• Integrates into AD environments
• Allows older hardware to work with modern networks

Cons

• Can be complex to configure fully
• Requires some Linux/Unix knowledge to administer
• Less commonly used protocols not supported
• Some features require commercial Samba add-ons

389 Directory Server

Pros

• Open source
• Enterprise-grade performance and scalability
• Robust access control and security features
• Multi-master replication for high availability
• Wide protocol support (LDAP, LDAPI, StartTLS, etc)
• Backward compatible with Fedora Directory Server

Cons

• Complex installation and configuration
• Steep learning curve
• Limited Windows AD integration features
• Lacks GUI for administration
• Not as widely used as Active Directory

Pricing Comparison

SambaBox

• Open Source

389 Directory Server

• Open Source