SBT vs Buildr

Struggling to choose between SBT and Buildr? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

SBT is a Development solution with tags like scala, java, build-tool, dependency-management, testing.

It boasts features such as Incremental compilation to avoid recompiling unchanged code, Built-in support for testing frameworks like ScalaTest and JUnit, Integration with Scala REPL for interactively testing code, Ability to build and package projects into JARs, Dependency management for automatically downloading libraries, Plugin ecosystem for extending functionality, Cross-platform and cross-Scala version support and pros including Very fast incremental builds, Concise and powerful DSL for build definitions, Seamless Scala integration, Active community behind it, Highly customizable and extensible.

On the other hand, Buildr is a Development product tagged with ruby, java, c, scala, build, automation.

Its standout features include Ruby DSL for build configuration, Supports multiple languages like Java, Scala, Groovy, Clojure, C/C++, Built-in support for testing frameworks like JUnit, TestNG, Specs, Parallel builds, Built-in dependency management, IDE integration, Continuous integration support, and it shines with pros like Simple and expressive Ruby DSL, Cross-platform and cross-language support, Active open source community, Integrates well with other tools, Fast parallel builds.

Feature	SBT	Buildr
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Development	Development

Product Overview

SBT

Description: SBT is a build tool for Scala and Java projects. It allows managing library dependencies, running tests, packaging projects, and other build-related tasks. SBT uses Scala syntax for its configuration files, making it easy to customize for Scala developers.

Buildr

Description: Buildr is an open-source software build system and project automation tool. It is written in Ruby and is designed for building Java, C/C++, Ruby, Scala and other language projects with ease. Buildr handles compilation, packaging, testing, and deployment.

Key Features Comparison

SBT Features

• Incremental compilation to avoid recompiling unchanged code
• Built-in support for testing frameworks like ScalaTest and JUnit
• Integration with Scala REPL for interactively testing code
• Ability to build and package projects into JARs
• Dependency management for automatically downloading libraries
• Plugin ecosystem for extending functionality
• Cross-platform and cross-Scala version support

Buildr Features

• Ruby DSL for build configuration
• Supports multiple languages like Java, Scala, Groovy, Clojure, C/C++
• Built-in support for testing frameworks like JUnit, TestNG, Specs
• Parallel builds
• Built-in dependency management
• IDE integration
• Continuous integration support

Pros & Cons Analysis

SBT

Pros

• Very fast incremental builds
• Concise and powerful DSL for build definitions
• Seamless Scala integration
• Active community behind it
• Highly customizable and extensible

Cons

• Steep learning curve
• Build files can be complex for large projects
• Limited adoption outside of Scala community

Buildr

Pros

• Simple and expressive Ruby DSL
• Cross-platform and cross-language support
• Active open source community
• Integrates well with other tools
• Fast parallel builds

Cons

• Steep learning curve for Ruby DSL
• Limited adoption compared to Maven/Gradle
• Not as feature-rich as some alternatives

Pricing Comparison

SBT

• Open Source

Buildr

• Open Source