Selenoid vs LambdaTest

Struggling to choose between Selenoid and LambdaTest? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Selenoid is a Development solution with tags like selenium, automation, docker, testing.

It boasts features such as Runs browser tests in Docker containers, Supports Selenium WebDriver protocol, Scalable - can run multiple browser sessions in parallel, Lightweight - consumes fewer resources than Selenium Grid, Open source and free to use and pros including Easy setup and configuration, Cost effective compared to paid solutions like BrowserStack, Allows testing on different browsers and versions, Integrates well with CI/CD pipelines, Active open source community.

On the other hand, LambdaTest is a Development product tagged with crossbrowser-testing, responsive-testing, realtime-testing, live-testing.

Its standout features include Cross browser testing, Responsive testing, Live interactive testing, Automated screenshot testing, Geolocation testing, Console error logging, Page speed testing, Video recording, Debugging tools, and it shines with pros like Supports a wide range of browsers and devices, Easy to use interface, Fast test execution, Integration with CI/CD tools, Scalable testing.

Feature	Selenoid	LambdaTest
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Development	Development

Product Overview

Selenoid

Description: Selenoid is an open source alternative to browser testing tools like Selenium Grid. It is lightweight, scalable, and allows running browser tests in Docker containers.

LambdaTest

Description: LambdaTest is a cloud-based cross browser testing platform that allows users to test their websites and web apps across 2000+ different browsers, browser versions and operating systems. It provides features like responsive testing, real-time cross browser testing, live interactive testing, and more.

Key Features Comparison

Selenoid Features

• Runs browser tests in Docker containers
• Supports Selenium WebDriver protocol
• Scalable - can run multiple browser sessions in parallel
• Lightweight - consumes fewer resources than Selenium Grid
• Open source and free to use

LambdaTest Features

• Cross browser testing
• Responsive testing
• Live interactive testing
• Automated screenshot testing
• Geolocation testing
• Console error logging
• Page speed testing
• Video recording
• Debugging tools

Pros & Cons Analysis

Selenoid

Pros

• Easy setup and configuration
• Cost effective compared to paid solutions like BrowserStack
• Allows testing on different browsers and versions
• Integrates well with CI/CD pipelines
• Active open source community

Cons

• Limited browser support compared to commercial solutions
• Requires more technical expertise to operate
• Not as feature rich as proprietary tools
• Lacks official support channels

LambdaTest

Pros

• Supports a wide range of browsers and devices
• Easy to use interface
• Fast test execution
• Integration with CI/CD tools
• Scalable testing

Cons

• No mobile app testing support
• Limited support for native apps
• Steep learning curve for advanced features

Pricing Comparison

Selenoid

• Open Source
• Free

LambdaTest

• Free
• Subscription-Based