Silktest vs Automise

Struggling to choose between Silktest and Automise? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Silktest is a Development solution with tags like automated-testing, functional-testing, regression-testing, crossbrowser-testing, object-recognition, debugging.

It boasts features such as Supports multiple languages like Java, .NET, Python, PHP, etc, Allows cross-browser testing across Chrome, Firefox, IE, Safari, etc, Provides object recognition and recording capabilities, Has debugging features like screenshots and logs, Integrates with CI/CD pipelines, Supports testing on real mobile devices, Offers data-driven testing capabilities and pros including Reduces manual testing time and effort, Enables robust and repeatable testing, Supports test automation for various platforms and browsers, Powerful object recognition makes test script creation fast, Detailed debugging information helps fix issues quickly.

On the other hand, Automise is a Development product tagged with automation, workflows, opensource, draganddrop, nocode.

Its standout features include Visual workflow designer, Cross-platform support, Built-in actions for web automation, Schedule and trigger workflows, Integrations with apps and services, and it shines with pros like Easy to use interface, Open source and free, Active community support, Extendable with JavaScript code, Available on Windows, Mac and Linux.

Feature	Silktest	Automise
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Development	Development

Product Overview

Silktest

Description: Silktest is an automated functional and regression testing tool for web, mobile, and desktop applications. It supports multiple languages and frameworks and allows for cross-browser testing. Silktest is known for its object recognition capabilities and debugging features.

Automise

Description: Automise is an open-source automation platform that allows you to automate repetitive tasks on your computer. It has a simple drag-and-drop interface to build workflows without coding.

Key Features Comparison

Silktest Features

• Supports multiple languages like Java, .NET, Python, PHP, etc
• Allows cross-browser testing across Chrome, Firefox, IE, Safari, etc
• Provides object recognition and recording capabilities
• Has debugging features like screenshots and logs
• Integrates with CI/CD pipelines
• Supports testing on real mobile devices
• Offers data-driven testing capabilities

Automise Features

• Visual workflow designer
• Cross-platform support
• Built-in actions for web automation
• Schedule and trigger workflows
• Integrations with apps and services

Pros & Cons Analysis

Silktest

Pros

• Reduces manual testing time and effort
• Enables robust and repeatable testing
• Supports test automation for various platforms and browsers
• Powerful object recognition makes test script creation fast
• Detailed debugging information helps fix issues quickly

Cons

• Initial script creation can be time consuming
• Maintenance of scripts can be challenging as application changes
• Limited support for some newer frameworks like Angular
• Steep learning curve for some features
• Can be expensive compared to open source tools

Automise

Pros

• Easy to use interface
• Open source and free
• Active community support
• Extendable with JavaScript code
• Available on Windows, Mac and Linux

Cons

• Limited built-in actions
• Steep learning curve for advanced workflows
• Not many premade templates/workflows
• Need technical knowledge for complex automations

Pricing Comparison

Silktest

• Subscription-Based
• Pay-As-You-Go

Automise

• Open Source
• Free