SimulAVR vs PICsim

Struggling to choose between SimulAVR and PICsim? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

SimulAVR is a Development solution with tags like avr, microcontroller, simulator, embedded.

It boasts features such as Cycle-accurate simulation of AVR microcontrollers, Supports a wide range of AVR chips including ATmega128, ATmega16, ATmega32, etc, Allows debugging code through gdb, Provides interfaces for connecting virtual peripherals, Can integrate with GTKWave to visualize signals, Has a CLI and GUI version, Allows simulation of interrupts and timers, Supports simulation of EEPROM and flash memory and pros including No need for physical hardware for testing, Faster testing and development cycle, Easier debugging than on physical devices, Allows testing edge cases and errors, Can simulate larger systems by connecting multiple microcontrollers.

On the other hand, PICsim is a Development product tagged with circuit-simulation, pic-programming, embedded-systems.

Its standout features include Circuit simulator for PIC microcontrollers, Supports various PIC models like PIC16F84A, PIC16F628A, PIC16F877A, PIC16F887, PIC18F452, etc., Allows testing PIC code on a virtual chip, Provides GUI workspace for circuit design, Includes debugging tools like breakpoints, variable watches, etc., Open-source and cross-platform (Windows, Linux, Mac), and it shines with pros like Free and open source, No need for physical PIC and hardware to test code, Fast prototyping and debugging, Supports many common PIC models, Active community support.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

SimulAVR

SimulAVR

SimulAVR is an open-source simulator for Atmel AVR microcontrollers. It allows you to develop and test AVR firmware on your computer without needing real hardware.

Categories:
avr microcontroller simulator embedded

SimulAVR Features

  1. Cycle-accurate simulation of AVR microcontrollers
  2. Supports a wide range of AVR chips including ATmega128, ATmega16, ATmega32, etc
  3. Allows debugging code through gdb
  4. Provides interfaces for connecting virtual peripherals
  5. Can integrate with GTKWave to visualize signals
  6. Has a CLI and GUI version
  7. Allows simulation of interrupts and timers
  8. Supports simulation of EEPROM and flash memory

Pricing

  • Open Source

Pros

No need for physical hardware for testing

Faster testing and development cycle

Easier debugging than on physical devices

Allows testing edge cases and errors

Can simulate larger systems by connecting multiple microcontrollers

Cons

Not a perfect substitute for testing on real hardware

Timing may not exactly match real microcontrollers

Limited support for some AVR peripherals

GUI version lacks some features compared to CLI


PICsim

PICsim

PICsim is an open-source circuit simulator and microcontroller emulator that allows users to test and debug PIC microcontroller code on their computer. It provides a GUI workspace for designing circuits and writing/uploading code to a virtual PIC chip.

Categories:
circuit-simulation pic-programming embedded-systems

PICsim Features

  1. Circuit simulator for PIC microcontrollers
  2. Supports various PIC models like PIC16F84A, PIC16F628A, PIC16F877A, PIC16F887, PIC18F452, etc.
  3. Allows testing PIC code on a virtual chip
  4. Provides GUI workspace for circuit design
  5. Includes debugging tools like breakpoints, variable watches, etc.
  6. Open-source and cross-platform (Windows, Linux, Mac)

Pricing

  • Open Source

Pros

Free and open source

No need for physical PIC and hardware to test code

Fast prototyping and debugging

Supports many common PIC models

Active community support

Cons

Limited to PIC microcontrollers only

Not all PIC models supported

Lacks some advanced debugging features

GUI could be more intuitive

Simulated environment, not 100% accurate like real hardware