Smalltalk vs SqueakJS

Struggling to choose between Smalltalk and SqueakJS? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Smalltalk is a Development solution with tags like objectoriented, dynamically-typed, reflective, integrated-development-environment, incremental-code-development.

It boasts features such as Object-oriented programming language, Live programming environment, Everything is an object, Uses message passing for communication between objects, Supports reflection and metaprogramming, Automatic memory management with garbage collection, Dynamically typed language and pros including Pure object-oriented programming model makes it easy to understand code, Live environment enables rapid prototyping and iterative development, Reflection and metaprogramming allow powerful program analysis and modification, Garbage collection simplifies memory management, Dynamically typed language is flexible and reduces boilerplate code.

On the other hand, SqueakJS is a Development product tagged with smalltalk, squeak, web-development.

Its standout features include Runs Smalltalk code in a web browser, Supports most Squeak language features and libraries, Integrated IDE and debugger, Graphics and multimedia support, Interoperability with JavaScript code, Persistence using browser storage, and it shines with pros like No installation required, Cross-platform - runs on any device with a modern web browser, Easy distribution - just share a URL, Great for education and learning programming.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

Smalltalk

Smalltalk

Smalltalk is an object-oriented, dynamically typed, reflective programming language. It was designed for incremental code development and testing, featuring an integrated development environment, a file system, and a system command shell. It paved the way for many IDE features that are now common in other languages.

Categories:
Development Programming Languages
objectoriented dynamically-typed reflective integrated-development-environment incremental-code-development

Smalltalk Features

  1. Object-oriented programming language
  2. Live programming environment
  3. Everything is an object
  4. Uses message passing for communication between objects
  5. Supports reflection and metaprogramming
  6. Automatic memory management with garbage collection
  7. Dynamically typed language

Pricing

  • Open Source
  • Free
  • Freemium

Pros

Pure object-oriented programming model makes it easy to understand code

Live environment enables rapid prototyping and iterative development

Reflection and metaprogramming allow powerful program analysis and modification

Garbage collection simplifies memory management

Dynamically typed language is flexible and reduces boilerplate code

Cons

Less commonly used than many other languages

Limited compile-time checking due to dynamic typing

Lack of static typing can make large programs harder to understand

Not designed for high-performance or system programming

Smaller ecosystem of third-party libraries compared to other languages

SqueakJS

SqueakJS

SqueakJS is an open-source implementation of the Squeak programming language that runs entirely in the web browser. It allows developers to create and run Squeak applications using only a web browser, with no additional plugins or installations required.

Categories:
Development Programming Languages
smalltalk squeak web-development

SqueakJS Features

  1. Runs Smalltalk code in a web browser
  2. Supports most Squeak language features and libraries
  3. Integrated IDE and debugger
  4. Graphics and multimedia support
  5. Interoperability with JavaScript code
  6. Persistence using browser storage

Pricing

  • Open Source

Pros

No installation required

Cross-platform - runs on any device with a modern web browser

Easy distribution - just share a URL

Great for education and learning programming

Cons

Performance limitations of JavaScript vs native code

Browser security restrictions may limit functionality

Limited access to hardware/OS compared to native apps

Debugging can be more difficult than native apps