Smithsonian Open Access vs Wikimedia Commons

Struggling to choose between Smithsonian Open Access and Wikimedia Commons? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Smithsonian Open Access is a Education & Reference solution with tags like open-access, smithsonian, research, digital-collections.

It boasts features such as Provides free online access to millions of 2D and 3D digital items from the Smithsonian collections, Includes images, videos, audio files, 3D models, research data, and more across art, history, culture, and science, Allows users to browse, search and download high resolution images and media, Offers an API for developers to build applications using the content and pros including Free access to high quality digitized content, Broad range of materials covering diverse topics and fields, High resolution downloads available, API enables innovative use of content.

On the other hand, Wikimedia Commons is a Online Services product tagged with images, videos, audio, media-repository, file-sharing, creative-commons.

Its standout features include Large collection of freely-usable media files, Centralized location to store and share files, Support for images, videos, sounds, and other file types, Used in educational and creative projects, and it shines with pros like Completely free to use, Massive selection of media, Active community of contributors, Flexible licensing options.

Feature	Smithsonian Open Access	Wikimedia Commons
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Education & Reference	Online Services

Product Overview

Smithsonian Open Access

Description: Smithsonian Open Access is an open access digital platform that provides free online access to millions of 2D and 3D digital items from the Smithsonian's collections. It includes images, videos, audio files, 3D models, research data, and more across art, history, culture, and science.

Wikimedia Commons

Description: Wikimedia Commons is a media repository containing over 60 million freely usable media files. It provides a centralized location to store and share images, videos, sounds, and other files for use in educational and creative projects.

Key Features Comparison

Smithsonian Open Access Features

• Provides free online access to millions of 2D and 3D digital items from the Smithsonian collections
• Includes images, videos, audio files, 3D models, research data, and more across art, history, culture, and science
• Allows users to browse, search and download high resolution images and media
• Offers an API for developers to build applications using the content

Wikimedia Commons Features

• Large collection of freely-usable media files
• Centralized location to store and share files
• Support for images, videos, sounds, and other file types
• Used in educational and creative projects

Pros & Cons Analysis

Smithsonian Open Access

Pros

• Free access to high quality digitized content
• Broad range of materials covering diverse topics and fields
• High resolution downloads available
• API enables innovative use of content

Cons

• Limited contextual or background information on some items
• No option to order physical prints or merchandise
• Some parts of the collection not yet digitized
• Website interface could be improved

Wikimedia Commons

Pros

• Completely free to use
• Massive selection of media
• Active community of contributors
• Flexible licensing options

Cons

• No quality control over uploads
• Difficult to find specific media
• Some files have unclear licensing terms
• Uploads require a Wikimedia account

Pricing Comparison

Smithsonian Open Access

• Free

Wikimedia Commons

• Open Source