Stackato vs Rancher

Struggling to choose between Stackato and Rancher? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Stackato is a Development solution with tags like cloud, paas, devops.

It boasts features such as Supports multiple languages and frameworks like Python, Ruby, Node.js, Java, PHP, etc., Built-in services like caching, messaging, databases, monitoring, logging, etc., Auto-scaling and load balancing of applications, Single sign-on and access control for security, CLI and UI for application management and monitoring, Integrated with Docker for containerization and pros including Fast and easy deployment of cloud applications, Reduces time to market for applications, Flexible scaling of resources, High availability and reliability, Cost efficient compared to IaaS solutions, DevOps friendly environment.

On the other hand, Rancher is a Network & Admin product tagged with kubernetes, docker, containers, orchestration, cloud-native.

Its standout features include Multi-cluster management, Simplified Kubernetes deployment, Centralized access control, Load balancing and service discovery, Storage orchestration, Monitoring and alerting, and it shines with pros like Intuitive UI for managing Kubernetes, Supports multiple cloud providers and on-prem, Automates complex tasks like upgrades, Built-in security policies and access control, Open source and free to use.

Feature	Stackato	Rancher
Overall Score	N/A	1
Primary Category	Development	Network & Admin

Product Overview

Stackato

Description: Stackato is a platform-as-a-service (PaaS) solution created by ActiveState for deploying and managing applications in the cloud. It provides an open platform to build, deploy, and scale apps in multiple languages using various frameworks.

Rancher

Description: Rancher is an open-source container management platform that allows users to deploy and manage Kubernetes clusters across multiple cloud providers or on-premises infrastructure. It provides a graphical user interface and API for managing containers and services across multiple clusters.

Key Features Comparison

Stackato Features

• Supports multiple languages and frameworks like Python, Ruby, Node.js, Java, PHP, etc.
• Built-in services like caching, messaging, databases, monitoring, logging, etc.
• Auto-scaling and load balancing of applications
• Single sign-on and access control for security
• CLI and UI for application management and monitoring
• Integrated with Docker for containerization

Rancher Features

• Multi-cluster management
• Simplified Kubernetes deployment
• Centralized access control
• Load balancing and service discovery
• Storage orchestration
• Monitoring and alerting

Pros & Cons Analysis

Stackato

Pros

• Fast and easy deployment of cloud applications
• Reduces time to market for applications
• Flexible scaling of resources
• High availability and reliability
• Cost efficient compared to IaaS solutions
• DevOps friendly environment

Cons

• Can be complex for beginners
• Limited customization compared to IaaS
• Requires re-architecting monolithic apps
• Vendor lock-in
• Additional costs for extra services and features

Rancher

Pros

• Intuitive UI for managing Kubernetes
• Supports multiple cloud providers and on-prem
• Automates complex tasks like upgrades
• Built-in security policies and access control
• Open source and free to use

Cons

• Steep learning curve
• Upgrades can be disruptive
• Limited native support for Windows
• Additional management layer on top of Kubernetes

Pricing Comparison

Stackato

• Free
• Subscription-Based

Rancher

• Open Source
• Subscription-Based