StageXL vs PixiJS

Struggling to choose between StageXL and PixiJS? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

StageXL is a Development solution with tags like flash, javascript, animation, 2d, games.

It boasts features such as Hardware accelerated 2D rendering using WebGL, Flash/ActionScript like API, Built-in animation and tweening engine, Mouse and touch input support, Sound and video playback, Bitmap and vector graphics support, Built-in filters and blend modes, Sprite sheet and texture atlas support, Canvas, WebGL and DOM renderers, Cross-platform - runs on desktop and mobile browsers and pros including Open source and free to use, Good performance due to hardware acceleration, Familiar API for Flash developers, Cross-platform support, Active development and community.

On the other hand, PixiJS is a Development product tagged with 2d, webgl, graphics, canvas, rendering.

Its standout features include WebGL renderer, Canvas renderer, SVG renderer, Sprite support, Texture support, Interaction support, Animation support, Full scene graph, Plugin support, and it shines with pros like Fast performance, Lightweight, Good documentation, Active community, Open source, Compatible with major browsers, Supports multiple renderers.

Feature	StageXL	PixiJS
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Development	Development

Product Overview

StageXL

Description: StageXL is an open-source Flash runtime written in JavaScript that allows you to create hardware-accelerated 2D content for the web. It provides a Flash-like API and workflow for building animations, games, and other interactive content to run cross-platform in browsers.

PixiJS

Description: PixiJS is a fast, lightweight 2D WebGL renderer optimized for beautiful interactive graphics. It offers a full scene graph, canvas and svg renderer, texture support, and plugin support.

Key Features Comparison

StageXL Features

• Hardware accelerated 2D rendering using WebGL
• Flash/ActionScript like API
• Built-in animation and tweening engine
• Mouse and touch input support
• Sound and video playback
• Bitmap and vector graphics support
• Built-in filters and blend modes
• Sprite sheet and texture atlas support
• Canvas, WebGL and DOM renderers
• Cross-platform - runs on desktop and mobile browsers

PixiJS Features

• WebGL renderer
• Canvas renderer
• SVG renderer
• Sprite support
• Texture support
• Interaction support
• Animation support
• Full scene graph
• Plugin support

Pros & Cons Analysis

StageXL

Pros

• Open source and free to use
• Good performance due to hardware acceleration
• Familiar API for Flash developers
• Cross-platform support
• Active development and community

Cons

• Limited documentation
• Not as feature rich as Flash
• Smaller community compared to other JS game engines
• No 3D support

PixiJS

Pros

• Fast performance
• Lightweight
• Good documentation
• Active community
• Open source
• Compatible with major browsers
• Supports multiple renderers

Cons

• Steep learning curve
• Limited 3D support
• Not ideal for complex 3D games
• Less flexible than some other graphics engines

Pricing Comparison

StageXL

• Open Source

PixiJS

• Open Source