Static Site Boilerplate vs Pandoc

Struggling to choose between Static Site Boilerplate and Pandoc? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Static Site Boilerplate is a Development solution with tags like starter-kit, static-site, boilerplate, webpack, postcss, es6.

It boasts features such as Modular file structure, Sass styling, Responsive design, Webpack bundling, PostCSS processing, ES6 support, Performance optimizations and pros including Open source, Modern build tools, Modular and scalable, Good for static sites, Fast load times.

On the other hand, Pandoc is a Office & Productivity product tagged with markdown, latex, html, converter, opensource.

Its standout features include Document conversion between multiple formats like Markdown, HTML, LaTeX, Word, EPUB, etc, Modular architecture allows adding new formats easily, Command line interface, Templates for custom output formats, Citations and bibliographies using CSL styles, Table of contents generation, Syntax highlighting, Math support using LaTeX and MathML, and it shines with pros like Free and open source, Cross-platform - works on Windows, Mac, Linux, Fast and efficient conversion, Support for many input and output formats, Customizable output using templates, Good documentation and community support.

Feature	Static Site Boilerplate	Pandoc
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Development	Office & Productivity

Product Overview

Static Site Boilerplate

Description: Static Site Boilerplate is an open-source starter kit for building static websites using modern tools like Webpack, PostCSS, and ES6. It provides a modular structure, Sass styling, responsive design, and optimizations for performance.

Pandoc

Description: Pandoc is a free and open-source document converter software that can convert documents between several markup formats including Markdown, HTML, LaTeX, and Word. It aims to be a 'swiss-army knife' for converting documents between formats.

Key Features Comparison

Static Site Boilerplate Features

• Modular file structure
• Sass styling
• Responsive design
• Webpack bundling
• PostCSS processing
• ES6 support
• Performance optimizations

Pandoc Features

• Document conversion between multiple formats like Markdown, HTML, LaTeX, Word, EPUB, etc
• Modular architecture allows adding new formats easily
• Command line interface
• Templates for custom output formats
• Citations and bibliographies using CSL styles
• Table of contents generation
• Syntax highlighting
• Math support using LaTeX and MathML

Pros & Cons Analysis

Static Site Boilerplate

Pros

• Open source
• Modern build tools
• Modular and scalable
• Good for static sites
• Fast load times

Cons

• Requires build step
• Some complexity in configuration
• Not ideal for complex apps
• Limited docs and support

Pandoc

Pros

• Free and open source
• Cross-platform - works on Windows, Mac, Linux
• Fast and efficient conversion
• Support for many input and output formats
• Customizable output using templates
• Good documentation and community support

Cons

• Command line only, no GUI
• Steep learning curve
• Formatting issues when converting complex documents
• Limited WYSIWYG editing features
• Does not support some niche formats

Pricing Comparison

Static Site Boilerplate

• Open Source

Pandoc

• Open Source