Steel Bank Common Lisp vs CMU Common Lisp

Struggling to choose between Steel Bank Common Lisp and CMU Common Lisp? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Steel Bank Common Lisp is a Development solution with tags like lisp, common-lisp, compiler, runtime.

It boasts features such as High performance compiler, Supports multiple platforms, Stable and fast runtime system, REPL environment, Unicode support, Threading support, FFI for calling C libraries, Can generate standalone executables and pros including Very fast execution, Mature and stable implementation, Good for developing complex applications, Strong community support, Free and open source.

On the other hand, CMU Common Lisp is a Development product tagged with common-lisp, lisp, programming-language.

Its standout features include Native code compiler, Foreign function interface, Documentation generation tools, Garbage collection, Object-oriented programming support, Macro system, Debugging and profiling tools, and it shines with pros like High performance, Mature and stable, Good documentation, Active community support, Free and open source.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

Steel Bank Common Lisp

Steel Bank Common Lisp

Steel Bank Common Lisp (SBCL) is a high performance open source Common Lisp compiler and runtime system. It is used for developing complex, multi-platform applications and is known for its stability and speed.

Categories:
lisp common-lisp compiler runtime

Steel Bank Common Lisp Features

  1. High performance compiler
  2. Supports multiple platforms
  3. Stable and fast runtime system
  4. REPL environment
  5. Unicode support
  6. Threading support
  7. FFI for calling C libraries
  8. Can generate standalone executables

Pricing

  • Open Source

Pros

Very fast execution

Mature and stable implementation

Good for developing complex applications

Strong community support

Free and open source

Cons

Steep learning curve for Lisp

Not as beginner friendly as other languages

Limited libraries compared to other languages


CMU Common Lisp

CMU Common Lisp

CMU Common Lisp is an open source implementation of the Common Lisp programming language developed at Carnegie Mellon University. It features an optimizing native code compiler, a foreign function interface, and tools for generating documentation.

Categories:
common-lisp lisp programming-language

CMU Common Lisp Features

  1. Native code compiler
  2. Foreign function interface
  3. Documentation generation tools
  4. Garbage collection
  5. Object-oriented programming support
  6. Macro system
  7. Debugging and profiling tools

Pricing

  • Open Source

Pros

High performance

Mature and stable

Good documentation

Active community support

Free and open source

Cons

Not as widely used as some other Lisps

Less libraries/packages than more popular Lisps

Older codebase

Limited platform support