SwiftSearch vs mlocate

Professional comparison and analysis to help you choose the right software solution for your needs. Compare features, pricing, pros & cons, and make an informed decision.

SwiftSearch icon
SwiftSearch
mlocate icon
mlocate

Expert Analysis & Comparison

Struggling to choose between SwiftSearch and mlocate? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

SwiftSearch is a Search solution with tags like private, search, no-tracking.

It boasts features such as Private search - Does not track users or collect personal data, Accurate search results - No filtering or personalization of results, Fast search speed - Quick loading of results, Ad-free search - No ads on search pages, Multiple search modes - Web, image, video, news, maps and more, Customizable interface - Change themes and layout, Advanced search tools - Tools for refined searches and pros including Protects privacy, Unbiased and accurate results, Fast performance, Ad-free clean interface, Very customizable, Powerful advanced search options.

On the other hand, mlocate is a Os & Utilities product tagged with file-search, locate-files, find-files.

Its standout features include Fast file lookup using filename database, Supports regular expressions for flexible searches, Database updated automatically in background, Handles files moved or deleted after database update, Ignores binary files by default to avoid slow searches, Indexes paths as well as filenames for more targeted results, and it shines with pros like Very fast compared to searching filesystem directly, Powerful regex support for complex queries, Keeps index updated automatically, Finds files even if moved/renamed after indexing, Lightweight and low system resource usage.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

Why Compare SwiftSearch and mlocate?

When evaluating SwiftSearch versus mlocate, both solutions serve different needs within the search ecosystem. This comparison helps determine which solution aligns with your specific requirements and technical approach.

Market Position & Industry Recognition

SwiftSearch and mlocate have established themselves in the search market. Key areas include private, search, no-tracking.

Technical Architecture & Implementation

The architectural differences between SwiftSearch and mlocate significantly impact implementation and maintenance approaches. Related technologies include private, search, no-tracking.

Integration & Ecosystem

Both solutions integrate with various tools and platforms. Common integration points include private, search and file-search, locate-files.

Decision Framework

Consider your technical requirements, team expertise, and integration needs when choosing between SwiftSearch and mlocate. You might also explore private, search, no-tracking for alternative approaches.

Feature SwiftSearch mlocate
Overall Score N/A N/A
Primary Category Search Os & Utilities
Target Users Developers, QA Engineers QA Teams, Non-technical Users
Deployment Self-hosted, Cloud Cloud-based, SaaS
Learning Curve Moderate to Steep Easy to Moderate

Product Overview

SwiftSearch
SwiftSearch

Description: SwiftSearch is a fast, private alternative to Google Search. It doesn't track users and provides accurate search results without filtering or personalized results.

Type: Open Source Test Automation Framework

Founded: 2011

Primary Use: Mobile app testing automation

Supported Platforms: iOS, Android, Windows

mlocate
mlocate

Description: mlocate is a command line utility in Linux for quickly locating files based on their name or a regular expression. It maintains a database of files and directories to allow fast lookups compared to searching the whole file system.

Type: Cloud-based Test Automation Platform

Founded: 2015

Primary Use: Web, mobile, and API testing

Supported Platforms: Web, iOS, Android, API

Key Features Comparison

SwiftSearch
SwiftSearch Features
  • Private search - Does not track users or collect personal data
  • Accurate search results - No filtering or personalization of results
  • Fast search speed - Quick loading of results
  • Ad-free search - No ads on search pages
  • Multiple search modes - Web, image, video, news, maps and more
  • Customizable interface - Change themes and layout
  • Advanced search tools - Tools for refined searches
mlocate
mlocate Features
  • Fast file lookup using filename database
  • Supports regular expressions for flexible searches
  • Database updated automatically in background
  • Handles files moved or deleted after database update
  • Ignores binary files by default to avoid slow searches
  • Indexes paths as well as filenames for more targeted results

Pros & Cons Analysis

SwiftSearch
SwiftSearch
Pros
  • Protects privacy
  • Unbiased and accurate results
  • Fast performance
  • Ad-free clean interface
  • Very customizable
  • Powerful advanced search options
Cons
  • Smaller index of webpages than Google
  • Fewer integrations with third-party services
  • Limited advanced features compared to Google
  • Lesser known brand
mlocate
mlocate
Pros
  • Very fast compared to searching filesystem directly
  • Powerful regex support for complex queries
  • Keeps index updated automatically
  • Finds files even if moved/renamed after indexing
  • Lightweight and low system resource usage
Cons
  • Not useful if filename unknown
  • Database can get large for huge filesystems
  • Must update database manually after major filesystem changes
  • Not designed for interactive browsing of files

Pricing Comparison

SwiftSearch
SwiftSearch
  • Freemium
mlocate
mlocate
  • Open Source

Get More Information

Ready to Make Your Decision?

Explore more software comparisons and find the perfect solution for your needs