Termshark vs RawCap

Struggling to choose between Termshark and RawCap? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Termshark is a Network & Admin solution with tags like terminal, network, protocol, analyzer, packets, cli.

It boasts features such as Captures live packet data from network interfaces, Displays packets in a terminal user interface, Filters packets using display filters, Analyzes protocols including TCP, UDP, HTTP, DNS, and more, Supports common capture file formats like PCAP and PCAPNG, Runs natively in Linux terminal without a GUI, Built on top of TShark and Wireshark libraries and pros including Lightweight terminal-based interface, No GUI overhead or dependencies, Works over SSH connections, Fast and responsive for analyzing live captures, Powerful display filters, Leverages Wireshark protocol analysis.

On the other hand, RawCap is a Os & Utilities product tagged with screencasting, screenshot, video-capture, open-source.

Its standout features include Captures raw audio and video data directly from screen, Lightweight and fast, Supports hotkeys for quick screen capture, Basic editing features like trimming and annotations, Screen recording with custom frame rates and resolutions, Screenshot capture, Device audio capture, Webcam video capture, and it shines with pros like Free and open source, Minimal impact on system resources, Easy to use with hotkeys, Captures raw footage for advanced editing, Cross-platform support.

Feature	Termshark	RawCap
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Network & Admin	Os & Utilities

Product Overview

Termshark

Description: Termshark is a terminal based network protocol analyzer. It allows you to inspect network traffic and analyze packets, similar to Wireshark, but runs in a terminal instead of a graphical interface.

RawCap

Description: RawCap is a free and open source screencasting and screenshot tool for Windows. It allows capturing raw audio and video data directly from the screen or devices. It is lightweight, supports hotkeys for quick capture, and has basic editing features.

Key Features Comparison

Termshark Features

• Captures live packet data from network interfaces
• Displays packets in a terminal user interface
• Filters packets using display filters
• Analyzes protocols including TCP, UDP, HTTP, DNS, and more
• Supports common capture file formats like PCAP and PCAPNG
• Runs natively in Linux terminal without a GUI
• Built on top of TShark and Wireshark libraries

RawCap Features

• Captures raw audio and video data directly from screen
• Lightweight and fast
• Supports hotkeys for quick screen capture
• Basic editing features like trimming and annotations
• Screen recording with custom frame rates and resolutions
• Screenshot capture
• Device audio capture
• Webcam video capture

Pros & Cons Analysis

Termshark

Pros

• Lightweight terminal-based interface
• No GUI overhead or dependencies
• Works over SSH connections
• Fast and responsive for analyzing live captures
• Powerful display filters
• Leverages Wireshark protocol analysis

Cons

• Less intuitive than GUI-based Wireshark
• Steeper learning curve for terminal usage
• Limited to keyboard-based interaction
• Harder to visualize packet flows
• No built-in statistical summaries

RawCap

Pros

• Free and open source
• Minimal impact on system resources
• Easy to use with hotkeys
• Captures raw footage for advanced editing
• Cross-platform support

Cons

• Limited built-in editing capabilities
• No advanced recording options
• No webcam screenshot capture
• No mobile support

Pricing Comparison

Termshark

• Open Source

RawCap

• Free
• Open Source