TinyProxy vs Lusca

Professional comparison and analysis to help you choose the right software solution for your needs. Compare features, pricing, pros & cons, and make an informed decision.

TinyProxy icon
TinyProxy
Lusca icon
Lusca

Expert Analysis & Comparison

Struggling to choose between TinyProxy and Lusca? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

TinyProxy is a Network & Admin solution with tags like proxy, anonymity, privacy.

It boasts features such as Lightweight HTTP/HTTPS proxy server, Runs on Linux, MacOS and Windows, Anonymizes web browsing sessions, Access control for connections, Extendable with custom plugins and pros including Open source and free, Small resource footprint, Simple configuration, Supports access control lists, Can be extended via plugins.

On the other hand, Lusca is a Security & Privacy product tagged with xss-protection, http-security-headers, nodejs-middleware.

Its standout features include Sets security-related HTTP headers like X-Frame-Options, X-XSS-Protection, etc, Protects against cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks, Protects against clickjacking, Blocks requests from certain user agents, Forces HTTPS/HSTS, CSRF protection, and it shines with pros like Easy to integrate into Express apps, Handles common security enhancements, Well-maintained and updated regularly, Lightweight with minimal performance impact.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

Why Compare TinyProxy and Lusca?

When evaluating TinyProxy versus Lusca, both solutions serve different needs within the network & admin ecosystem. This comparison helps determine which solution aligns with your specific requirements and technical approach.

Market Position & Industry Recognition

TinyProxy and Lusca have established themselves in the network & admin market. Key areas include proxy, anonymity, privacy.

Technical Architecture & Implementation

The architectural differences between TinyProxy and Lusca significantly impact implementation and maintenance approaches. Related technologies include proxy, anonymity, privacy.

Integration & Ecosystem

Both solutions integrate with various tools and platforms. Common integration points include proxy, anonymity and xss-protection, http-security-headers.

Decision Framework

Consider your technical requirements, team expertise, and integration needs when choosing between TinyProxy and Lusca. You might also explore proxy, anonymity, privacy for alternative approaches.

Feature TinyProxy Lusca
Overall Score N/A N/A
Primary Category Network & Admin Security & Privacy
Target Users Developers, QA Engineers QA Teams, Non-technical Users
Deployment Self-hosted, Cloud Cloud-based, SaaS
Learning Curve Moderate to Steep Easy to Moderate

Product Overview

TinyProxy
TinyProxy

Description: TinyProxy is a light-weight open source HTTP and HTTPS proxy server. It runs on Linux, MacOS, and Windows and allows users to anonymize web browsing sessions and control internet access. TinyProxy is configurable, supports access control, and can be extended with custom plugins.

Type: Open Source Test Automation Framework

Founded: 2011

Primary Use: Mobile app testing automation

Supported Platforms: iOS, Android, Windows

Lusca
Lusca

Description: Lusca is an open-source Node.js web application security middleware. It helps secure Express apps by setting various HTTP headers, protecting against cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks, and more. Useful for quickly adding security enhancements.

Type: Cloud-based Test Automation Platform

Founded: 2015

Primary Use: Web, mobile, and API testing

Supported Platforms: Web, iOS, Android, API

Key Features Comparison

TinyProxy
TinyProxy Features
  • Lightweight HTTP/HTTPS proxy server
  • Runs on Linux, MacOS and Windows
  • Anonymizes web browsing sessions
  • Access control for connections
  • Extendable with custom plugins
Lusca
Lusca Features
  • Sets security-related HTTP headers like X-Frame-Options, X-XSS-Protection, etc
  • Protects against cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks
  • Protects against clickjacking
  • Blocks requests from certain user agents
  • Forces HTTPS/HSTS
  • CSRF protection

Pros & Cons Analysis

TinyProxy
TinyProxy
Pros
  • Open source and free
  • Small resource footprint
  • Simple configuration
  • Supports access control lists
  • Can be extended via plugins
Cons
  • Limited feature set compared to larger proxies
  • No web-based interface for configuration
  • Lacks advanced caching and optimization features
  • Only supports basic authentication methods
Lusca
Lusca
Pros
  • Easy to integrate into Express apps
  • Handles common security enhancements
  • Well-maintained and updated regularly
  • Lightweight with minimal performance impact
Cons
  • Not a complete security solution - still need other measures
  • Requires some configuration for more advanced use cases
  • Only works for Node.js/Express apps

Pricing Comparison

TinyProxy
TinyProxy
  • Open Source
Lusca
Lusca
  • Open Source

Get More Information

TinyProxy
TinyProxy
TinyProxy
Learn More About TinyProxy
Lusca
Lusca
Lusca
Learn More About Lusca

Ready to Make Your Decision?

Explore more software comparisons and find the perfect solution for your needs

Browse More Software
Back to Homepage
Company
Explore
Resources

Alternatives, made obvious.

© 2025 Sugggest.com. All Rights Reserved.
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Cookie Policy Legal