TinyProxy vs Varnish

Struggling to choose between TinyProxy and Varnish? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

TinyProxy is a Network & Admin solution with tags like proxy, anonymity, privacy.

It boasts features such as Lightweight HTTP/HTTPS proxy server, Runs on Linux, MacOS and Windows, Anonymizes web browsing sessions, Access control for connections, Extendable with custom plugins and pros including Open source and free, Small resource footprint, Simple configuration, Supports access control lists, Can be extended via plugins.

On the other hand, Varnish is a Network & Admin product tagged with caching, content-delivery, acceleration.

Its standout features include Caching and optimization of content delivery, Speeds up websites by reducing requests to backend servers, Sits in front of web servers as a reverse proxy, Supports load balancing, Caching of static and dynamic content, Caching rules based on URLs, cookies, device type, etc, Health checks for origin servers, Grace mode to serve stale content if backends are down, Edge Side Includes for dynamic caching, Logging and monitoring capabilities, and it shines with pros like Significant performance improvements, Reduces load on backend servers, Open source with active development community, Highly configurable and customizable, Integrates well with many frameworks/CMSs, Can scale horizontally with multiple Varnish servers.

Feature	TinyProxy	Varnish
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Network & Admin	Network & Admin

Product Overview

TinyProxy

Description: TinyProxy is a light-weight open source HTTP and HTTPS proxy server. It runs on Linux, MacOS, and Windows and allows users to anonymize web browsing sessions and control internet access. TinyProxy is configurable, supports access control, and can be extended with custom plugins.

Varnish

Description: Varnish is an open source web application accelerator designed to speed up websites by caching and optimizing content delivery. It sits in front of web servers and caches frequently-accessed content, reducing requests to backend servers.

Key Features Comparison

TinyProxy Features

• Lightweight HTTP/HTTPS proxy server
• Runs on Linux, MacOS and Windows
• Anonymizes web browsing sessions
• Access control for connections
• Extendable with custom plugins

Varnish Features

• Caching and optimization of content delivery
• Speeds up websites by reducing requests to backend servers
• Sits in front of web servers as a reverse proxy
• Supports load balancing
• Caching of static and dynamic content
• Caching rules based on URLs, cookies, device type, etc
• Health checks for origin servers
• Grace mode to serve stale content if backends are down
• Edge Side Includes for dynamic caching
• Logging and monitoring capabilities

Pros & Cons Analysis

TinyProxy

Pros

• Open source and free
• Small resource footprint
• Simple configuration
• Supports access control lists
• Can be extended via plugins

Cons

• Limited feature set compared to larger proxies
• No web-based interface for configuration
• Lacks advanced caching and optimization features
• Only supports basic authentication methods

Varnish

Pros

• Significant performance improvements
• Reduces load on backend servers
• Open source with active development community
• Highly configurable and customizable
• Integrates well with many frameworks/CMSs
• Can scale horizontally with multiple Varnish servers

Cons

• Complex configuration
• Steep learning curve
• No GUI, managed via command line
• Caching needs to be configured properly
• Not ideal for sites with highly dynamic content

Pricing Comparison

TinyProxy

• Open Source

Varnish

• Open Source