Uno Platform vs NativeScript

Struggling to choose between Uno Platform and NativeScript? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Uno Platform is a Development solution with tags like c, xaml, mobile, desktop, web, open-source.

It boasts features such as Write once, run everywhere (mobile, desktop, web) using C# and XAML, Leverages existing XAML knowledge from WPF, UWP and Xamarin.Forms, Hot Reload to see UI changes in real-time, MVVM architecture support, Native performance and look & feel, Access to native APIs and SDKs, Open source under the MIT license and pros including Single codebase for multiple platforms, Productivity boost from reusing XAML skills, Rapid development with Hot Reload, Native performance unlike hybrid approaches, Free and open source.

On the other hand, NativeScript is a Development product tagged with crossplatform, native, javascript, typescript, ios, android.

Its standout features include Write code in JavaScript/TypeScript, Access native APIs, Reuse code across iOS, Android & Web, Open source under Apache 2.0, Hot module replacement, LiveSync for instant app updates, Angular, Vue.js and React support, and it shines with pros like Write once, run anywhere, Performance of native apps, Access full native capabilities, Large open source community, Free and open source.

Feature	Uno Platform	NativeScript
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Development	Development

Product Overview

Uno Platform

Description: Uno Platform is an open-source UI framework that allows you to build native mobile, desktop and web applications using C# and XAML from a single codebase. It leverages XAML from WPF, UWP and Xamarin.Forms.

NativeScript

Description: NativeScript is an open source framework for building native iOS and Android apps using JavaScript or TypeScript. It allows developers to reuse skills and code from web development and build truly native mobile applications with access to native APIs.

Key Features Comparison

Uno Platform Features

• Write once, run everywhere (mobile, desktop, web) using C# and XAML
• Leverages existing XAML knowledge from WPF, UWP and Xamarin.Forms
• Hot Reload to see UI changes in real-time
• MVVM architecture support
• Native performance and look & feel
• Access to native APIs and SDKs
• Open source under the MIT license

NativeScript Features

• Write code in JavaScript/TypeScript
• Access native APIs
• Reuse code across iOS, Android & Web
• Open source under Apache 2.0
• Hot module replacement
• LiveSync for instant app updates
• Angular, Vue.js and React support

Pros & Cons Analysis

Uno Platform

Pros

• Single codebase for multiple platforms
• Productivity boost from reusing XAML skills
• Rapid development with Hot Reload
• Native performance unlike hybrid approaches
• Free and open source

Cons

• Limited number of controls compared to WPF
• Smaller community than alternatives like React Native
• Still evolving with breaking changes
• Limited documentation

NativeScript

Pros

• Write once, run anywhere
• Performance of native apps
• Access full native capabilities
• Large open source community
• Free and open source

Cons

• Steeper learning curve than native SDKs
• Less documentation than native SDKs
• Limited number of UI components
• Not as many third-party plugins as native

Pricing Comparison

Uno Platform

• Open Source

NativeScript

• Open Source