Uno Platform vs Qt

Struggling to choose between Uno Platform and Qt? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Uno Platform is a Development solution with tags like c, xaml, mobile, desktop, web, open-source.

It boasts features such as Write once, run everywhere (mobile, desktop, web) using C# and XAML, Leverages existing XAML knowledge from WPF, UWP and Xamarin.Forms, Hot Reload to see UI changes in real-time, MVVM architecture support, Native performance and look & feel, Access to native APIs and SDKs, Open source under the MIT license and pros including Single codebase for multiple platforms, Productivity boost from reusing XAML skills, Rapid development with Hot Reload, Native performance unlike hybrid approaches, Free and open source.

On the other hand, Qt is a Development product tagged with crossplatform, gui, cli, desktop-apps, mobile-apps, embedded-systems.

Its standout features include Cross-platform development, Comprehensive widget set and UI building tools, Integrated IDE (Qt Creator), Signals and slots for inter-object communication, Model/view architecture, Graphics framework and 2D rendering engine, XML parser, Networking and connectivity libraries, Multimedia and audio support, Database access through SQL drivers, Web browser engine (Qt WebEngine), and it shines with pros like Write once, deploy anywhere, Large ecosystem of libraries and add-ons, High performance and small executable sizes, Integrated GUI designer and debugger, Clean and consistent API design, Good documentation and community support.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

Uno Platform

Uno Platform

Uno Platform is an open-source UI framework that allows you to build native mobile, desktop and web applications using C# and XAML from a single codebase. It leverages XAML from WPF, UWP and Xamarin.Forms.

Categories:
c xaml mobile desktop web open-source

Uno Platform Features

  1. Write once, run everywhere (mobile, desktop, web) using C# and XAML
  2. Leverages existing XAML knowledge from WPF, UWP and Xamarin.Forms
  3. Hot Reload to see UI changes in real-time
  4. MVVM architecture support
  5. Native performance and look & feel
  6. Access to native APIs and SDKs
  7. Open source under the MIT license

Pricing

  • Open Source

Pros

Single codebase for multiple platforms

Productivity boost from reusing XAML skills

Rapid development with Hot Reload

Native performance unlike hybrid approaches

Free and open source

Cons

Limited number of controls compared to WPF

Smaller community than alternatives like React Native

Still evolving with breaking changes

Limited documentation


Qt

Qt

Qt is a cross-platform application development framework focused on creating GUI and CLI apps for desktop, mobile and embedded platforms. It includes a class library and tools designed to streamline the process of writing and maintaining applications across platforms.

Categories:
crossplatform gui cli desktop-apps mobile-apps embedded-systems

Qt Features

  1. Cross-platform development
  2. Comprehensive widget set and UI building tools
  3. Integrated IDE (Qt Creator)
  4. Signals and slots for inter-object communication
  5. Model/view architecture
  6. Graphics framework and 2D rendering engine
  7. XML parser
  8. Networking and connectivity libraries
  9. Multimedia and audio support
  10. Database access through SQL drivers
  11. Web browser engine (Qt WebEngine)

Pricing

  • Open Source
  • Commercial License

Pros

Write once, deploy anywhere

Large ecosystem of libraries and add-ons

High performance and small executable sizes

Integrated GUI designer and debugger

Clean and consistent API design

Good documentation and community support

Cons

Steep learning curve

Binary compatibility issues when upgrading

Limited native look and feel on some platforms

Not as lightweight as some alternatives

Lacks some features of native platforms