Usetrace vs TestComplete

Struggling to choose between Usetrace and TestComplete? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Usetrace is a Development solution with tags like tracing, profiling, monitoring, optimization.

It boasts features such as Application performance monitoring, Code-level profiling, Transaction tracing, Error and exception tracking, Alerting and notifications, Custom metrics and dashboards, Distributed tracing, OpenTelemetry support, Kubernetes monitoring and pros including Open source and free, Lightweight and low overhead, Integrates with many languages and frameworks, Provides detailed performance insights, Allows optimizing bottlenecks, Can be self-hosted on premises, Has alerting and automation capabilities.

On the other hand, TestComplete is a Development product tagged with automated-testing, ui-testing, functional-testing, regression-testing, crossbrowser-testing, load-testing.

Its standout features include Record and playback functionality to create automated UI tests, Support for multiple testing frameworks like keyword-driven, data-driven, hybrid, Cross-browser testing on multiple browsers and browser versions, Mobile app testing on emulators and real devices, API testing with REST and SOAP protocols, Integration with CI/CD pipelines, Scripting in JavaScript, Python, VBScript, Object recognition using image-based object spy, Smart test generator to auto-generate test cases, and it shines with pros like No coding required to create tests, Wide range of supported technologies and frameworks, Good for both manual and automated testing, Detailed reporting and analytics, Active user community and documentation.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

Usetrace

Usetrace

Usetrace is an open-source application performance management and monitoring tool. It helps developers trace, profile and monitor their applications to optimize performance. Usetrace provides insight into bottleneck areas and helps identify optimizations.

Categories:
tracing profiling monitoring optimization

Usetrace Features

  1. Application performance monitoring
  2. Code-level profiling
  3. Transaction tracing
  4. Error and exception tracking
  5. Alerting and notifications
  6. Custom metrics and dashboards
  7. Distributed tracing
  8. OpenTelemetry support
  9. Kubernetes monitoring

Pricing

  • Open Source

Pros

Open source and free

Lightweight and low overhead

Integrates with many languages and frameworks

Provides detailed performance insights

Allows optimizing bottlenecks

Can be self-hosted on premises

Has alerting and automation capabilities

Cons

Lacks some advanced features of commercial APM tools

Requires more configuration than some APM solutions

Limited high-level analysis compared to paid tools

Not as polished UI as some commercial alternatives

Requires expertise to get most value from tool


TestComplete

TestComplete

TestComplete is an automated testing tool used by software testers and developers to test desktop, web, and mobile applications. It supports a range of testing methodologies and allows for creating automated UI tests without scripting.

Categories:
automated-testing ui-testing functional-testing regression-testing crossbrowser-testing load-testing

TestComplete Features

  1. Record and playback functionality to create automated UI tests
  2. Support for multiple testing frameworks like keyword-driven, data-driven, hybrid
  3. Cross-browser testing on multiple browsers and browser versions
  4. Mobile app testing on emulators and real devices
  5. API testing with REST and SOAP protocols
  6. Integration with CI/CD pipelines
  7. Scripting in JavaScript, Python, VBScript
  8. Object recognition using image-based object spy
  9. Smart test generator to auto-generate test cases

Pricing

  • Free Trial
  • Subscription-Based

Pros

No coding required to create tests

Wide range of supported technologies and frameworks

Good for both manual and automated testing

Detailed reporting and analytics

Active user community and documentation

Cons

Steep learning curve

Scripting requires programming knowledge

No built-in support for performance or security testing

Limited support options on lower pricing tiers