Watir vs TestComplete

Struggling to choose between Watir and TestComplete? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Watir is a Development solution with tags like automation, testing, ruby.

It boasts features such as Automates web browsers like Chrome, Firefox, Safari, etc, Enables writing tests to validate web applications, Supports multiple programming languages like Ruby, Python, Java, etc, Integrates with testing frameworks like RSpec, Test::Unit, etc, Provides API for interacting with web pages like clicking links, filling forms, Executes JavaScript embedded in web pages and pros including Open source and free to use, Cross-browser testing capability, Large community support, Integration with popular test frameworks, Supports multiple languages for writing tests.

On the other hand, TestComplete is a Development product tagged with automated-testing, ui-testing, functional-testing, regression-testing, crossbrowser-testing, load-testing.

Its standout features include Record and playback functionality to create automated UI tests, Support for multiple testing frameworks like keyword-driven, data-driven, hybrid, Cross-browser testing on multiple browsers and browser versions, Mobile app testing on emulators and real devices, API testing with REST and SOAP protocols, Integration with CI/CD pipelines, Scripting in JavaScript, Python, VBScript, Object recognition using image-based object spy, Smart test generator to auto-generate test cases, and it shines with pros like No coding required to create tests, Wide range of supported technologies and frameworks, Good for both manual and automated testing, Detailed reporting and analytics, Active user community and documentation.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

Watir

Watir

Watir is an open-source Ruby library for automating web browsers. It drives browsers the same way people do, enabling testing and scripting of web applications. Watir supports IE, Firefox, Chrome, Safari and Opera.

Categories:
automation testing ruby

Watir Features

  1. Automates web browsers like Chrome, Firefox, Safari, etc
  2. Enables writing tests to validate web applications
  3. Supports multiple programming languages like Ruby, Python, Java, etc
  4. Integrates with testing frameworks like RSpec, Test::Unit, etc
  5. Provides API for interacting with web pages like clicking links, filling forms
  6. Executes JavaScript embedded in web pages

Pricing

  • Open Source

Pros

Open source and free to use

Cross-browser testing capability

Large community support

Integration with popular test frameworks

Supports multiple languages for writing tests

Cons

Only works for web application testing

Requires knowledge of scripting and test frameworks

Not ideal for complex AJAX-heavy sites

Limited support for mobile browsers


TestComplete

TestComplete

TestComplete is an automated testing tool used by software testers and developers to test desktop, web, and mobile applications. It supports a range of testing methodologies and allows for creating automated UI tests without scripting.

Categories:
automated-testing ui-testing functional-testing regression-testing crossbrowser-testing load-testing

TestComplete Features

  1. Record and playback functionality to create automated UI tests
  2. Support for multiple testing frameworks like keyword-driven, data-driven, hybrid
  3. Cross-browser testing on multiple browsers and browser versions
  4. Mobile app testing on emulators and real devices
  5. API testing with REST and SOAP protocols
  6. Integration with CI/CD pipelines
  7. Scripting in JavaScript, Python, VBScript
  8. Object recognition using image-based object spy
  9. Smart test generator to auto-generate test cases

Pricing

  • Free Trial
  • Subscription-Based

Pros

No coding required to create tests

Wide range of supported technologies and frameworks

Good for both manual and automated testing

Detailed reporting and analytics

Active user community and documentation

Cons

Steep learning curve

Scripting requires programming knowledge

No built-in support for performance or security testing

Limited support options on lower pricing tiers