WireMock vs Mockable

Struggling to choose between WireMock and Mockable? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

WireMock is a Development solution with tags like mocking, stubbing, http, testing.

It boasts features such as HTTP request stubbing, Request matching and response templating, Record and playback of stub mappings, Proxying, HTTPS support, Customizable request matching, Customizable response generation, Self-contained executable JAR with embedded web server and pros including Enables testing against simulated APIs without needing real endpoints, Faster and more flexible than mocking HTTP interactions in unit tests, Avoids flakiness when testing against remote endpoints, Simplifies testing of edge cases and failure modes, Enables working offline.

On the other hand, Mockable is a Development product tagged with mocking, testing, rest-api, http-responses.

Its standout features include Create mock APIs with custom responses, Simulate different HTTP status codes and response times, Share mock APIs with other developers, Import APIs from Postman collections, Monitor request history and analytics, Integrations with CI/CD pipelines, and it shines with pros like Speeds up development by eliminating dependency on real backends, Allows testing against simulated responses, Great for collaboration between frontend and backend teams, Simple and intuitive interface, Free tier available.

Feature	WireMock	Mockable
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Development	Development

Product Overview

WireMock

Description: WireMock is an open source tool for simulating HTTP-based APIs during development. It enables mocking and stubbing of APIs and servers before they are fully developed to enable faster testing of applications that integrate with them.

Mockable

Description: Mockable is an online API mocking tool that allows developers to quickly create simulated HTTP responses for REST API endpoints without needing a real backend. It makes it easy to mock APIs for development and testing.

Key Features Comparison

WireMock Features

• HTTP request stubbing
• Request matching and response templating
• Record and playback of stub mappings
• Proxying
• HTTPS support
• Customizable request matching
• Customizable response generation
• Self-contained executable JAR with embedded web server

Mockable Features

• Create mock APIs with custom responses
• Simulate different HTTP status codes and response times
• Share mock APIs with other developers
• Import APIs from Postman collections
• Monitor request history and analytics
• Integrations with CI/CD pipelines

Pros & Cons Analysis

WireMock

Pros

• Enables testing against simulated APIs without needing real endpoints
• Faster and more flexible than mocking HTTP interactions in unit tests
• Avoids flakiness when testing against remote endpoints
• Simplifies testing of edge cases and failure modes
• Enables working offline

Cons

• Additional component to install and run during testing
• Can make tests more brittle if stubs drift from actual API behavior
• Stubbing complex APIs can require significant upfront effort

Mockable

Pros

• Speeds up development by eliminating dependency on real backends
• Allows testing against simulated responses
• Great for collaboration between frontend and backend teams
• Simple and intuitive interface
• Free tier available

Cons

• Limited functionality compared to full API testing tools
• No native support for SOAP or GraphQL APIs
• No mocking of push APIs or webhooks
• Free tier has usage limits
• No built-in API documentation features

Pricing Comparison

WireMock

• Open Source

Mockable

• Freemium
• Subscription-Based