Workflow Engine .NET vs Cadence Workflow

Struggling to choose between Workflow Engine .NET and Cadence Workflow? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Workflow Engine .NET is a Development solution with tags like opensource, net, workflow.

It boasts features such as Modeling and execution of workflows, Support for branching, looping, parallel execution, Persistence and state management, Compensation and cancellation of workflow activities, Extensibility and custom activities, .NET integration and pros including Open source and free, Runs on .NET platform, Good for building workflow-driven applications, Flexible and extensible.

On the other hand, Cadence Workflow is a Development product tagged with orchestration, automation, microservices, async, faulttolerant.

Its standout features include Distributed architecture, Fault tolerant, Highly scalable, Async coordination of tasks, Long running workflows, Open source, and it shines with pros like Reliable and resilient, Scales horizontally, Loose coupling between services, Easy to monitor and debug, Active open source community.

Feature	Workflow Engine .NET	Cadence Workflow
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Development	Development

Product Overview

Workflow Engine .NET

Description: Workflow Engine .NET is an open-source workflow management system for building workflow-enabled applications on the .NET platform. It provides a framework for modeling and executing workflows with support for branching, looping, parallel execution, compensation, cancellation, persistence, and more.

Cadence Workflow

Description: Cadence Workflow is an open-source workflow orchestration platform that allows users to automate long-running business logic in a fault-tolerant and scalable way. It is designed for microservice architectures to coordinate async tasks.

Key Features Comparison

Workflow Engine .NET Features

• Modeling and execution of workflows
• Support for branching, looping, parallel execution
• Persistence and state management
• Compensation and cancellation of workflow activities
• Extensibility and custom activities
• .NET integration

Cadence Workflow Features

• Distributed architecture
• Fault tolerant
• Highly scalable
• Async coordination of tasks
• Long running workflows
• Open source

Pros & Cons Analysis

Workflow Engine .NET

Pros

• Open source and free
• Runs on .NET platform
• Good for building workflow-driven applications
• Flexible and extensible

Cons

• Limited adoption and community support
• Not as full-featured as commercial workflow engines
• Steep learning curve

Cadence Workflow

Pros

• Reliable and resilient
• Scales horizontally
• Loose coupling between services
• Easy to monitor and debug
• Active open source community

Cons

• Steep learning curve
• Complex deployments
• Version upgrades can be difficult
• Limited GUI for monitoring
• Not ideal for small scale use cases

Pricing Comparison

Workflow Engine .NET

• Open Source

Cadence Workflow

• Open Source