Xmonad vs i3

Struggling to choose between Xmonad and i3? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Xmonad is a Os & Utilities solution with tags like tiling, haskell, unix, linux, window-manager.

It boasts features such as Tiling window manager, Configurable in Haskell, Dynamic window management, Keyboard-driven workflow, Extensible through plugins and pros including Highly customizable, Very efficient use of screen space, Keyboard shortcuts for everything, Lightweight and fast.

On the other hand, i3 is a Os & Utilities product tagged with tiling, keyboarddriven, lightweight, configurable, unixlike.

Its standout features include Tiling window manager, Tree-like window organization, Customizable keyboard shortcuts, Simple, lightweight and fast, Support for multiple workspaces, and it shines with pros like Very efficient use of screen space, Highly customizable, Light on system resources, Keyboard-driven workflow, Stable and mature codebase.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

Xmonad

Xmonad

Xmonad is a tiling window manager for Linux and other Unix-like operating systems. It is written in Haskell and dynamically manages windows to maximize screen space and productivity.

Categories:
tiling haskell unix linux window-manager

Xmonad Features

  1. Tiling window manager
  2. Configurable in Haskell
  3. Dynamic window management
  4. Keyboard-driven workflow
  5. Extensible through plugins

Pricing

  • Open Source

Pros

Highly customizable

Very efficient use of screen space

Keyboard shortcuts for everything

Lightweight and fast

Cons

Steep learning curve

Configuration requires Haskell knowledge

Not beginner friendly


i3

i3

i3 is a tiling window manager for Linux and other Unix-like operating systems. It is designed to be simple, fast, and lightweight while still being customizable and flexible. i3 organizes application windows in a tree-like structure and allows efficient window switching and placement.

Categories:
tiling keyboarddriven lightweight configurable unixlike

I3 Features

  1. Tiling window manager
  2. Tree-like window organization
  3. Customizable keyboard shortcuts
  4. Simple, lightweight and fast
  5. Support for multiple workspaces

Pricing

  • Open Source
  • Free

Pros

Very efficient use of screen space

Highly customizable

Light on system resources

Keyboard-driven workflow

Stable and mature codebase

Cons

Steep learning curve

Manual configuration required

Not designed for touchscreens

Less flexibility in window arrangements

Less integrated with desktop environment