ZAPTEST vs Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing

Struggling to choose between ZAPTEST and Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

ZAPTEST is a Security & Privacy solution with tags like opensource, web-application-security, vulnerability-scanning, sql-injection, crosssite-scripting.

It boasts features such as Automated vulnerability scanning, Manual testing through proxies, Spidering and crawling, Passive scanning, Forced browsing, Fuzzing, Attack scripts, Integrations with CI/CD pipelines, APIs for automation, Extensible via add-ons and pros including Free and open source, Easy to use, Comprehensive feature set, Active community support, Cross-platform, Integrates with many tools, Extensible and customizable.

On the other hand, Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing is a Development product tagged with functional-testing, web-application-testing, mobile-application-testing, test-automation.

Its standout features include GUI-based test creation, Cross-browser testing, Mobile app testing, API testing, Integrations with CI/CD tools, Scriptless test authoring, Object recognition, Test debugging, and it shines with pros like Supports multiple protocols and environments, Reusable test components, Headless testing, Parallel test execution, Detailed reporting, Open architecture and extensibility.

Feature	ZAPTEST	Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Security & Privacy	Development

Product Overview

ZAPTEST

Description: ZAPTEST is an open-source web application security testing tool that helps developers and security analysts identify vulnerabilities in their web applications. It provides automated scanning of sites to detect common vulnerabilities like SQL injection, cross-site scripting, and insecure configurations.

Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing

Description: Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing is a software testing tool used for functional, regression, and performance testing of web and mobile applications. It supports a range of protocols and allows for automated test creation and execution.

Key Features Comparison

ZAPTEST Features

• Automated vulnerability scanning
• Manual testing through proxies
• Spidering and crawling
• Passive scanning
• Forced browsing
• Fuzzing
• Attack scripts
• Integrations with CI/CD pipelines
• APIs for automation
• Extensible via add-ons

Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing Features

• GUI-based test creation
• Cross-browser testing
• Mobile app testing
• API testing
• Integrations with CI/CD tools
• Scriptless test authoring
• Object recognition
• Test debugging

Pros & Cons Analysis

ZAPTEST

Pros

• Free and open source
• Easy to use
• Comprehensive feature set
• Active community support
• Cross-platform
• Integrates with many tools
• Extensible and customizable

Cons

• Can be resource intensive
• Steep learning curve
• Prone to false positives
• Limited default policies
• Not ideal for black box testing

Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing

Pros

• Supports multiple protocols and environments
• Reusable test components
• Headless testing
• Parallel test execution
• Detailed reporting
• Open architecture and extensibility

Cons

• Steep learning curve
• Expensive licensing
• Script maintenance can be challenging
• Limited support for some modern web technologies

Pricing Comparison

ZAPTEST

• Open Source

Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing

• Subscription-Based
• Pay-As-You-Go