ZeroStack vs Proxmox Virtual Environment

Struggling to choose between ZeroStack and Proxmox Virtual Environment? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

ZeroStack is a Development solution with tags like open-source, serverless, autoscaling, monitoring, simplified-operations.

It boasts features such as Self-driving infrastructure, Built-in monitoring and logging, Auto-scaling, Serverless functions, API gateway, Object storage, Identity and access management, Continuous deployment and pros including Simplifies infrastructure management, Reduces operational costs, Enables rapid scaling, Increases developer productivity.

On the other hand, Proxmox Virtual Environment is a Network & Admin product tagged with virtualization, containers, open-source.

Its standout features include Kernel-based Virtual Machine (KVM) hypervisor, Linux Containers (LXC), Web-based GUI for management, High Availability (HA) clustering, Live Migration of virtual machines, Software-defined networking, Storage backends like Ceph, ZFS, iSCSI, REST API, and it shines with pros like Open source and free to use, Good community support, Easy to set up and use, Supports multiple hypervisors and containers, Flexible storage options, Scalable and extensible.

Feature	ZeroStack	Proxmox Virtual Environment
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Development	Network & Admin

Product Overview

ZeroStack

Description: ZeroStack is an open source platform that provides serverless infrastructure for developers to build, run and scale applications without managing servers. It offers auto-scaling, built-in monitoring, and simplifies operations.

Proxmox Virtual Environment

Description: Proxmox Virtual Environment (Proxmox VE) is an open-source server virtualization platform based on QEMU/KVM virtualization and LXC containers. It provides a web-based GUI for managing VMs and containers.

Key Features Comparison

ZeroStack Features

• Self-driving infrastructure
• Built-in monitoring and logging
• Auto-scaling
• Serverless functions
• API gateway
• Object storage
• Identity and access management
• Continuous deployment

Proxmox Virtual Environment Features

• Kernel-based Virtual Machine (KVM) hypervisor
• Linux Containers (LXC)
• Web-based GUI for management
• High Availability (HA) clustering
• Live Migration of virtual machines
• Software-defined networking
• Storage backends like Ceph, ZFS, iSCSI
• REST API

Pros & Cons Analysis

ZeroStack

Pros

• Simplifies infrastructure management
• Reduces operational costs
• Enables rapid scaling
• Increases developer productivity

Cons

• Potential vendor lock-in
• Limited customization options
• Not suitable for complex legacy applications

Proxmox Virtual Environment

Pros

• Open source and free to use
• Good community support
• Easy to set up and use
• Supports multiple hypervisors and containers
• Flexible storage options
• Scalable and extensible

Cons

• Steeper learning curve than other solutions
• Not as feature rich as proprietary alternatives
• Limited third party integrations
• No phone or email technical support

Pricing Comparison

ZeroStack

• Open Source
• Custom Pricing

Proxmox Virtual Environment

• Open Source
• Subscription-Based (Proxmox VE Enterprise)