Alignak vs Shinken

Struggling to choose between Alignak and Shinken? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Alignak is a Network & Admin solution with tags like monitoring, alerting, opensource.

It boasts features such as Modular architecture, Configuration validation, Advanced scheduling capabilities, Native REST API, High availability support, Scalable for large environments, Event broker for passing information between daemons, Support for passive and active monitoring checks, Template support for simplified configuration and pros including Open source and free, Flexible and customizable, Good community support, Compatible with Nagios plugins and configurations, Scales well for large environments, Native REST API for integration.

On the other hand, Shinken is a Network & Admin product tagged with opensource, monitoring, nagioscompatible, scalable.

Its standout features include Distributed monitoring architecture, Horizontal scalability, Nagios configuration file compatibility, Nagios plugin compatibility, Web-based UI, REST API, Alerting and notification capabilities, Reporting and graphing, Service checks, Host checks, Dependency handling, and it shines with pros like Good scalability, Large ecosystem of Nagios plugins, Open source and free, Web UI for easy management, REST API for automation, Compatible with existing Nagios configs.

Feature	Alignak	Shinken
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Network & Admin	Network & Admin

Product Overview

Alignak

Description: Alignak is an open source monitoring framework that can be used to monitor network services, servers, and applications. It is compatible with Nagios plugins and configurations.

Shinken

Description: Shinken is an open-source monitoring framework that is compatible with Nagios configuration and plugins. It is designed to scale to large environments with thousands of hosts and services. Shinken leverages distributed architecture to improve performance over Nagios.

Key Features Comparison

Alignak Features

• Modular architecture
• Configuration validation
• Advanced scheduling capabilities
• Native REST API
• High availability support
• Scalable for large environments
• Event broker for passing information between daemons
• Support for passive and active monitoring checks
• Template support for simplified configuration

Shinken Features

• Distributed monitoring architecture
• Horizontal scalability
• Nagios configuration file compatibility
• Nagios plugin compatibility
• Web-based UI
• REST API
• Alerting and notification capabilities
• Reporting and graphing
• Service checks
• Host checks
• Dependency handling

Pros & Cons Analysis

Alignak

Pros

• Open source and free
• Flexible and customizable
• Good community support
• Compatible with Nagios plugins and configurations
• Scales well for large environments
• Native REST API for integration

Cons

• Steeper learning curve than other monitoring tools
• Less out-of-box dashboards and graphs than commercial options
• Requires more manual configuration than commercial alternatives
• Limited official documentation

Shinken

Pros

• Good scalability
• Large ecosystem of Nagios plugins
• Open source and free
• Web UI for easy management
• REST API for automation
• Compatible with existing Nagios configs

Cons

• Steeper learning curve than Nagios
• Additional components to install and configure
• Not as widely used as Nagios
• Limited official support

Pricing Comparison

Alignak

• Open Source

Shinken

• Open Source