Amazon Web Services vs synnefo

Struggling to choose between Amazon Web Services and synnefo? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Amazon Web Services is a Online Services solution with tags like cloud, infrastructure, storage, compute, scalable.

It boasts features such as Elastic Compute Cloud (EC2) for scalable computing capacity, Simple Storage Service (S3) for cloud object storage, Relational Database Service (RDS) for managed databases, Lambda for running code without provisioning servers, Route 53 for DNS management, CloudFront for content delivery network, Security services like IAM for access controls and pros including Wide range of services for flexible and scalable cloud solutions, Pay-as-you-go pricing allows optimization of costs, Global infrastructure provides low latency access, Frequent updates and new features added, Integrated services work well together, High availability and durability of core services.

On the other hand, synnefo is a Online Services product tagged with iaas, open-source, virtual-machines, storage, networking, web-interface, api.

Its standout features include Web-based management interface, API access, Virtual machine management, Block storage management, Object storage management, Networking management, Access control and quotas, Usage monitoring and billing, High availability support, OpenStack integration, and it shines with pros like Open source and free, Flexible and customizable, Good for private clouds, Active development community.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

Amazon Web Services

Amazon Web Services

Amazon Web Services (AWS) is a comprehensive and widely adopted cloud computing platform provided by Amazon. Offering a vast array of computing resources, storage options, and scalable services, AWS enables businesses and individuals to build, deploy, and manage applications and infrastructure in the cloud.

Categories:
Online Services Cloud Computing
cloud infrastructure storage compute scalable

Amazon Web Services Features

  1. Elastic Compute Cloud (EC2) for scalable computing capacity
  2. Simple Storage Service (S3) for cloud object storage
  3. Relational Database Service (RDS) for managed databases
  4. Lambda for running code without provisioning servers
  5. Route 53 for DNS management
  6. CloudFront for content delivery network
  7. Security services like IAM for access controls

Pricing

  • Pay-As-You-Go

Pros

Wide range of services for flexible and scalable cloud solutions

Pay-as-you-go pricing allows optimization of costs

Global infrastructure provides low latency access

Frequent updates and new features added

Integrated services work well together

High availability and durability of core services

Cons

Complex array of services can have steep learning curve

Vendor lock-in once architecture is built on AWS

Costs can spiral out of control if not managed carefully

Frequent changes can disrupt workloads

Requires monitoring and automation to manage at scale

synnefo

synnefo

Synnefo is an open-source cloud computing software that provides infrastructure-as-a-service. It allows users to manage virtual machines, storage, and networking resources through a web interface or API. Synnefo is designed for building private and public cloud deployments.

Categories:
Online Services Cloud Computing
iaas open-source virtual-machines storage networking web-interface api

Synnefo Features

  1. Web-based management interface
  2. API access
  3. Virtual machine management
  4. Block storage management
  5. Object storage management
  6. Networking management
  7. Access control and quotas
  8. Usage monitoring and billing
  9. High availability support
  10. OpenStack integration

Pricing

  • Open Source

Pros

Open source and free

Flexible and customizable

Good for private clouds

Active development community

Cons

Limited adoption so far

Steep learning curve

Not as feature rich as proprietary solutions