Ampache vs Jellyfin

Professional comparison and analysis to help you choose the right software solution for your needs. Compare features, pricing, pros & cons, and make an informed decision.

Ampache icon
Ampache
Jellyfin icon
Jellyfin

Expert Analysis & Comparison

Struggling to choose between Ampache and Jellyfin? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Ampache is a Audio & Music solution with tags like music, audio, streaming, media-server.

It boasts features such as Web-based audio/video streaming, Music library management, Podcast support, Smart/dynamic playlists, User accounts and permissions, Mobile app access, Audio fingerprinting, Cover art support, Transcoding support, API access, Theme support and pros including Free and open source, Self-hosted option, Good community support, Extensive features, Customizable and extensible.

On the other hand, Jellyfin is a Media & Entertainment product tagged with opensource, selfhosted, media-library, streaming, transcoding, automation.

Its standout features include Media library management, Metadata retrieval, Transcoding, Streaming to clients, User management, Client apps for various devices, Plugin support, and it shines with pros like Free and open source, No subscription fees, Self-hosted, Customizable via plugins, Works with many devices.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

Why Compare Ampache and Jellyfin?

When evaluating Ampache versus Jellyfin, both solutions serve different needs within the audio & music ecosystem. This comparison helps determine which solution aligns with your specific requirements and technical approach.

Market Position & Industry Recognition

Ampache and Jellyfin have established themselves in the audio & music market. Key areas include music, audio, streaming.

Technical Architecture & Implementation

The architectural differences between Ampache and Jellyfin significantly impact implementation and maintenance approaches. Related technologies include music, audio, streaming, media-server.

Integration & Ecosystem

Both solutions integrate with various tools and platforms. Common integration points include music, audio and opensource, selfhosted.

Decision Framework

Consider your technical requirements, team expertise, and integration needs when choosing between Ampache and Jellyfin. You might also explore music, audio, streaming for alternative approaches.

Feature Ampache Jellyfin
Overall Score N/A 1
Primary Category Audio & Music Media & Entertainment
Target Users Developers, QA Engineers QA Teams, Non-technical Users
Deployment Self-hosted, Cloud Cloud-based, SaaS
Learning Curve Moderate to Steep Easy to Moderate

Product Overview

Ampache
Ampache

Description: Ampache is an open-source web-based audio/video streaming application and file manager. It allows you to access your music and video collection from any internet-connected device.

Type: Open Source Test Automation Framework

Founded: 2011

Primary Use: Mobile app testing automation

Supported Platforms: iOS, Android, Windows

Jellyfin
Jellyfin

Description: Jellyfin is a free, open-source media server for organizing and streaming your personal video, music, and photo collections. It is a community-driven fork of Emby with an emphasis on free software without ties to proprietary ecosystems.

Type: Cloud-based Test Automation Platform

Founded: 2015

Primary Use: Web, mobile, and API testing

Supported Platforms: Web, iOS, Android, API

Key Features Comparison

Ampache
Ampache Features
  • Web-based audio/video streaming
  • Music library management
  • Podcast support
  • Smart/dynamic playlists
  • User accounts and permissions
  • Mobile app access
  • Audio fingerprinting
  • Cover art support
  • Transcoding support
  • API access
  • Theme support
Jellyfin
Jellyfin Features
  • Media library management
  • Metadata retrieval
  • Transcoding
  • Streaming to clients
  • User management
  • Client apps for various devices
  • Plugin support

Pros & Cons Analysis

Ampache
Ampache
Pros
  • Free and open source
  • Self-hosted option
  • Good community support
  • Extensive features
  • Customizable and extensible
Cons
  • Setup can be complex
  • Mobile apps lack some features
  • Missing some modern streaming features
  • Development is slow
Jellyfin
Jellyfin
Pros
  • Free and open source
  • No subscription fees
  • Self-hosted
  • Customizable via plugins
  • Works with many devices
Cons
  • Can be complex to set up
  • Less polished UI than some competitors
  • Limited native client apps
  • Less active development than some competitors

Pricing Comparison

Ampache
Ampache
  • Open Source
Jellyfin
Jellyfin
  • Open Source

Get More Information

Ready to Make Your Decision?

Explore more software comparisons and find the perfect solution for your needs