Ansible Semaphore vs Earthly

Struggling to choose between Ansible Semaphore and Earthly? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Ansible Semaphore is a Development solution with tags like ansible, automation, configuration-management, devops.

It boasts features such as Web-based UI for managing Ansible, Role-based access control, Playbook repository, Playbook scheduling, Inventory management, Playbook execution and monitoring, REST API and pros including Open source and free, Easy to install and configure, Good for small teams, Active development community, Integrates well with Ansible.

On the other hand, Earthly is a Development product tagged with build, automation, monorepo, caching, reproducible.

Its standout features include Declarative build definitions, Automatic caching and parallelization, Built specifically for monorepos, Integration with Docker containers, Support for incremental builds, Cross-platform support, and it shines with pros like Fast and reproducible builds, Simplifies build configuration, Improves developer productivity, Makes dependency management easier, Good for large, complex projects.

Feature	Ansible Semaphore	Earthly
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Development	Development

Product Overview

Ansible Semaphore

Description: Ansible Semaphore is an open source alternative to Ansible Tower that provides a web-based user interface and REST API for managing Ansible playbooks. It allows you to easily run Ansible playbooks and view detailed logs without needing direct access to Ansible.

Earthly

Description: Earthly is an open-source build automation tool for monorepo-style codebases. It allows developers to define builds and dependencies in a declarative way, then automatically parallelizes and caches builds for fast, reproducible development.

Key Features Comparison

Ansible Semaphore Features

• Web-based UI for managing Ansible
• Role-based access control
• Playbook repository
• Playbook scheduling
• Inventory management
• Playbook execution and monitoring
• REST API

Earthly Features

• Declarative build definitions
• Automatic caching and parallelization
• Built specifically for monorepos
• Integration with Docker containers
• Support for incremental builds
• Cross-platform support

Pros & Cons Analysis

Ansible Semaphore

Pros

• Open source and free
• Easy to install and configure
• Good for small teams
• Active development community
• Integrates well with Ansible

Cons

• Lacks some advanced features of Ansible Tower
• Not ideal for large enterprises
• Limited native integrations with 3rd party tools
• Less polished UI than Tower
• Limited support options

Earthly

Pros

• Fast and reproducible builds
• Simplifies build configuration
• Improves developer productivity
• Makes dependency management easier
• Good for large, complex projects

Cons

• Limited adoption so far
• Steep learning curve
• Less flexibility than general build tools
• Only supports Docker containers
• Mainly aimed at monorepos

Pricing Comparison

Ansible Semaphore

• Open Source

Earthly

• Open Source